Answer: The Contract is valid.
Explanation:
Under the UCC’s Statute of Frauds, transactions above $500 for goods cannot be made orally alone and have to be written in writing as well. This is the law that Rosenfield relied on.
However, Fallsview can argue that the Passover Retreat is not a Good, but rather a Service in which case it does not fall under the Statute.
The main bone of contention thereby becomes, if indeed it is a service or a good.
If it is a Hybrid of both, then the Court needs to decide if the services outweigh the goods involved.
From the text we see that the following were included in the package, food, entertainment, and lectures on religious subjects.
Food is the only good there and is outweighed by Entertainment and lectures on religious subjects.
As such, the contract is valid as it is for more service than good.
Answer:
Firm’s sales uncollected for year is 42 days.
Explanation:
Account receivable turnover ratio = $621,000 / $70,422
Account receivable turnover ratio = 8.69
Thus, accounts receivable turnover ratio is 8.69
Average collection period = 365 / Account receivable turnover ratio
Average collection period = 365 days / 8.69
Average collection period = 42.00
Thus, firm’s sales uncollected for year is 42 days.
Answer:
2) the time consumers save when purchasing goods there.
Explanation:
Their name explains everything. A convenience store is a store where someone can go and purchase goods easily and without any type of difficulty.
Of course a Walmart is cheaper, but will you travel 20 minutes just to get there, and spend 20 more minutes choosing and paying for a cheap good like a Coke, and then 20 more minutes back home. Whatever you save on buying the Coke, you will spend 50 times more in gas and personal time.
So even if a Coke costs $1 more in a 7-Eleven, it is worth it. You will save a lot of money by purchasing your Coke there.
Answer:
The change in the market for Cripps is positively related with other apples.
Explanation:
The Cripps pink apples are the substitute to the other apples so there is a direct relationship between the price one commodity and the demand for its substitute commodity. Therefore, if the price of Cripps pink apples rises, then the demand for other apples will rise also because of substitute goods. Similarly, if the price fall, then the demand for other apples will also fall. Thus substitute goods encompass a positive relationship.
