If the scale of it were able to provide a more reliable
measure, it is expected that the score of the person in the scale would have
caused or resulted into a more relatively stable from his or her day to day
life or daily life.
Answer:
$200,000
Explanation:
Asset is recorded in the books on a value of the consideration paid at the time to acquire the asset. In this question the building is purchased by issuing $200,000 (10,000 shares x $20) value of shares.So, the building should be recorded at a value of $200,000 in the books.
The Journal Entry for the transaction is as follow:
Dr. Building $200,000
Cr. Common Stock (10,000 x $4) $40,000
Cr. Add-in-Capital common stock ($200,000-$40,000) $160,000
<span>WWW , also referred as Web 1.0 is the traditional World Wide Web and </span>Web 2.0 is the current state of online technologies.
The biggest difference between Web 2.0 and Web 1.0 is the greater collaboration among Internet users, content providers and enterprises (websites that enable community-based input, interaction, content-sharing and collaboration). At Web 1.0 <span>data was posted on Web sites, and users simply viewed or downloaded the content. </span> Web 2.0 offers<span> more dynamic Web that is more organized and is based on </span>serving Web applications<span> to users.</span>
Answer:
D) infant mortality
Explanation:
Infant mortality rate (IMR) is a ratio that measures how many infants (children under one year of age) die for every 1,000 live births. The IMR serves as an indicator of how healthy a country's population is.
The countries with the highest IMR are Afghanistan, Somalia, Central African Republic. While the countries with the lowest IMR are Japan, Iceland and Singapore.
Answer: Because the issuer official no longer holds elected office, the contribution limits of Rule G-37 do not apply.
Explanation:
Rule G-37 is a way to ensure that Municipal Issuers are not unduly influenced by those who donated to their campaigns to get into a position to become Municipal Issuers.
It prohibites for 2 years, Municipal Finance Professionals (MFP) amongst others from engaging in municipal securities business with a Municipal issuer.
An exception however, is that if the MFP is entitled to a vote for the Official in question, they can donate no more than $250 per election.
Seeing as the Municipal Issuer Officer has lost her position, the MFP need not worry about this $250 limit as it no longer applies to her. The MFP is free to donate $500 to the "clean-up" campaign.
