Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
The correct answer is the evolutionary perspective. It is
because the evolutionary perspective is a perspective in which they are likely
to base on the universal mental characteristic that are present among
individual and what they all share, it is likely to focus more on natural
selection and that they have the belief that the behavior of an individual
develop in different or certain directions.
President Andrew Jackson reason to remove the Native Americans because he wants the land for settlers to settle in and he didn't want the Native Americans to bother them and he anted the to leave but they wouldn't buge so the law stated they had to be forced and walk to what is now present-day Oklahoma Hope this helps:)
its Determined by its density
Answer:
Social Anthropology means the study of human behavior. Apart from this, we have cultural and linguistic anthropology. And we need to understand the term power. When He-Man says, " I have the power." He means he has the personality and ability to influence certain events and its outcome, which might be negative as well though it should always be positive to ensure safe conditions for humanity. Some humans get the power from God through a lot of hard work or worship. Remember, worship is not that easy. And some are given the power by government, which some from any private firm. Now Social Anthropology is all about the study of behavior. And they talk quite a lot about the power, as general civilians seldom harm or do better even for society. And the people who do either of these have the power of one sort out of the above mentioned. This is the reason why Anthropologists always examine power.
Explanation:
Please check the answer.
