1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marta_Voda [28]
3 years ago
10

Plzzz help I’m being timed!!!

Mathematics
2 answers:
vichka [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

W

Step-by-step explanation:

quadrant 4 is the bottom right one

BartSMP [9]3 years ago
7 0

W: 4;5

V: 4;2

Y: -1;2

X: -5;-1

You might be interested in
Please help!! Is it possible to prove that the triangles are congruent by using the AAS Congruence Theorem?
goldenfox [79]

Answer:

no, there is not enough information to use AAS congruence theorem to prove the triangles are congruent

6 0
3 years ago
Cfjsylukyxydoydodkzlslyldl
Otrada [13]

Answer: we dont understand cfjsylukyxydoydodkzlslyldl

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Each side of the regular hexagon below measures 8 cm. What is the area of the hexagon? A hexagon is shown. A triangle with a 60
damaskus [11]

Answer:

<u>The area of the hexagon is A. 96√3 cm²</u>

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's recall the formula of the area of an hexagon, this way:

Area = (3√3/2) * s²

Area = (3√3/2) * 8²

Area = (3√3/2) * 64

Area = 192√3/2

Area = 96√3 cm²

<u>The area of the hexagon is A. 96√3 cm²</u>

7 0
3 years ago
Larry says 5 × 900 is less than 5 × 9,000. Doni says 5 × 900 is greater than 5 × 9,000. Which statements about the two products
BartSMP [9]

Answer:

Larry's statement is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

Larry says 5 × 900 is less than 5 × 9,000.

Doni says 5 × 900 is greater than 5 × 9,000.

5 × 900 = 4500

5 × 9000 = 45,000

45,000 is greater than 4500 because the place value of 45,000 is tens thousands and 4500 is Thousands.

Hence, Larry's statement is correct.(Larry says 5 × 900 is less than 5 × 9,000.)

8 0
3 years ago
Claire says that she can draw an obtuse equilateral triangle. Is she correct? Explain.
notka56 [123]
No, because an equilateral triangle is also equiangular so all sides must be 60° (60+60+60=180) and an obtuse angle is more than 90° so the triangle would not be equilateral.

Hope I Helped (:
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!!!!!!
    13·2 answers
  • Solve the equation<br> ×<br> - + 9 = 4<br> 5
    13·1 answer
  • A hotel Manager needed to seat 250 guests at a wedding party. Can he seat them in groups of 5 or 10?
    7·1 answer
  • What is the lowest common denominator of 5 and 9
    11·1 answer
  • Wich proportion would you set up to change 5 pounds to ounces
    5·2 answers
  • Solve the quadratic equation for x. What is the product when the roots are multiplied? (x + 2)2 = 1 A) −3 B) −6 C) −9 D) 3
    6·1 answer
  • A school is tracking its freshmen attendance for the first marking period. Shown below is a table summarizing the findings for t
    5·1 answer
  • Find the value of x. Please help will mark brainliest
    6·1 answer
  • Look at the photo to see the question ​
    9·2 answers
  • Nestor works at a garden center where he pots plants. It takes him 2 1/2 hours to pot 15 plants.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!