Answer: Consequently, the Third Republic, originally envisioned as a provisional government, instead became the permanent form of government of France. The French Constitutional Laws of 1875 defined the composition of the Third Republic.
Explanation:
It is true that the origins of different federations are dissimilar, and federalism promotes unity in diversity. Both Options B and D are true statements about Federalism.
- Federalism is a form of governance, wherein, the powers and functions of a country are divided between or shared between the Center and the States.
- This power-sharing form of governance, is understood to be useful/effective in governing a nation smoothly, without any hassles.
- Their powers and functions will be clearly divided as per the Constitution of each nation, and they may also contain a list of powers and/or functions, that can be exercised by both the center and the state.
- But each nation's federation is different and need not be similar.
- For instance, both United States as well as India, follow a Federal System.
- However, in the United States, the States are more powerful than the Center, while in India, the Center has more powers than the States.
- But in both cases, their respective citizens identify themselves as a citizen of either the United States or of India, and not of individual states.
- Thereby promoting unity in diversity.
Therefore, it is clear that both the statement options B and D are correct answers.
Disclaimer:
<em>Your question was incomplete. Please check below for the full content. </em>
<em>"Which of the following two statements are true about federalism?</em>
<em>A. All federations have a similar scheme of distribution of powers.</em>
<em>B. The origins of different federations are dissimilar.</em>
<em>C. Federalism promotes unity at the cost of diversity.</em>
<em>D. Federalism promotes unity in diversity."</em>
Learn more about The Federal System here:
brainly.com/question/2871279
#SPJ10
The main reason why both the Spanish and Portuguese wanted to explore was "<span>c. to establish sea routes to the Indies for trade," since Indian products were in high demand. </span>
Could you be more specific ?
On when was the time or something like that?
The Articles of Confederation was the United States' first constitution. It was very weak and gave little to no power to the federal government.
Under the Articles of Confederation, the government could not tax the states, regulate trade, create and enforce laws properly, draft soldiers, change the Articles without the approval of the states, and other important matters. This meant that most of the power was in the hands of the states and the citizens.
The Anti-Federalists were in favor of the Articles of Confederation, as they usually associated the government having power with British tyranny. They wanted to keep the power in their hands. Federalists wanted to change the Articles of Confederation and wanted to have a strong government. They thought having a strong government meant having a strong country.
Eventually, the Constitutional Convention of 1787 was called in order to fix the Articles of Confederation. Many people were starting to realize how weak it was and how it was harming the country. While the original goal was just to amend the Articles, they ended up getting scrapped altogether and the United States Constitution was created instead.
The United States Constitution fixed the<u> major problem of having a weak government</u>. With the new constitution, the government now had power. They could create and enforce laws, but the government was separated into branches in order to keep the balance of power in check. They could now tax the states, so they could pay war debts and better the country. They could also regulate trade, draft soldiers, and do other things that are much needed by the government.
Although many people were worried about the government obtaining power, the Bill of Rights was created in order to protect the rights and powers of the citizens.