1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Artemon [7]
3 years ago
11

The graph below shows the solution set of which inequality?

Mathematics
1 answer:
svp [43]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

D x^2 smaller than or equal 4

Step-by-step explanation:

if you tried to get a number on the number line and put it to fit in the equation it will just end to equal or smaller than 4

You might be interested in
In triangle RST, m∠R > m∠S + m∠T. Which must be true of triangle RST? Check all that apply.
solmaris [256]

Answer:

1. m∠R > 90°

2. m∠S + m∠T < 90°

4. m∠R > m∠T

5. m∠R > m∠S

Step-by-step explanation:

<h3>General strategy</h3>
  1. prove the statement starting from known facts, or
  2. disprove the statement by finding a counterexample

Helpful fact:  Recall that the Triangle Sum Theorem states that m∠R + m∠S + m∠T = 180°.

<u>Option 1.  m∠R > 90°</u>

Start with m∠R > m∠S + m∠T.

Adding m∠R to both sides of the inequality...

m∠R + m∠R > m∠R + m∠S + m∠T

There are two things to note here:

  1. The left side of this inequality is 2*m∠R
  2. The right side of the inequality is exactly equal to the Triangle Sum Theorem expression

2* m∠R > 180°

Dividing both sides of the inequality by 2...

m∠R > 90°

So, the first option must be true.

<u>Option 2.  m∠S + m∠T < 90°</u>

Start with m∠R > m∠S + m∠T.

Adding (m∠S + m∠T) to both sides of the inequality...

m∠R + (m∠S + m∠T) >  m∠S + m∠T + (m∠S + m∠T)

There are two things to note here:

  1. The left side of this inequality is exactly equal to the Triangle Sum Theorem expression
  2. The right side of the inequality is 2*(m∠S+m∠T)

Substituting

180° > 2* (m∠S+m∠T)

Dividing both sides of the inequality by 2...

90° > m∠S+m∠T

So, the second option must be true.

<u>Option 3.  m∠S = m∠T</u>

Not necessarily.  While m∠S could equal m∠T, it doesn't have to.  

Example 1:  m∠S = m∠T = 10°;  By the triangle sum Theorem, m∠R = 160°, and the angles satisfy the original inequality.

Example 2:  m∠S = 15°, and m∠T = 10°;  By the triangle sum Theorem, m∠R = 155°, and the angles still satisfy the original inequality.

So, option 3 does NOT have to be true.

<u>Option 4.  m∠R > m∠T</u>

Start with the fact that ∠S is an angle of a triangle, so m∠S cannot be zero or negative, and thus m∠S > 0.

Add m∠T to both sides.

(m∠S) + m∠T > (0) + m∠T

m∠S + m∠T > m∠T

Recall that m∠R > m∠S + m∠T.

By the transitive property of inequalities, m∠R > m∠T.

So, option 4 must be true.

<u>Option 5.  m∠R > m∠S</u>

Start with the fact that ∠T is an angle of a triangle, so m∠T cannot be zero or negative, and thus m∠T > 0.

Add m∠S to both sides.

m∠S + (m∠T) > m∠S + (0)

m∠S + m∠T > m∠S

Recall that m∠R > m∠S + m∠T.

By the transitive property of inequalities, m∠R > m∠S.

So, option 5 must be true.

<u>Option 6.  m∠S > m∠T</u>

Not necessarily.  While m∠S could be greater than m∠T, it doesn't have to be.  (See examples 1 and 2 from option 3.)

So, option 6 does NOT have to be true.

4 0
2 years ago
HELP PLEASE! 40 POINTS AND WILL MARK BRAINLIEST.
pshichka [43]

Answer:

Explicit rule, because you can find the 40th term directly using the explicit rule. You would need to find the first 39 terms before finding the 40th terms using recursive rule.

hope this helps...

3 0
3 years ago
15. An irregular pentagon has side lengths of (x + 3), (2x - 4), (4x + 5),
Tcecarenko [31]
I’m my opinion I thick it could be A
7 0
3 years ago
Andy has three planks of wood. Two planks are each 1.5 m long. One plank is 2.5m long. What is the total length of all the three
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

Given:

Two planks are each 1.5 m long.

One plank is 2.5m long.

To find:

The total length of all the three planks.

Solution:

Two planks are each 1.5 m long. So,

First plank = 1.5 m

Second plank = 1.5 m

One plank is 2.5m long. So,

Third plank = 2.5 m

Now, the total length of all the three planks is

\text{Total length}=\text{First plank + Second plank + Third plank}

\text{Total length}=1.5+1.5+2.5

\text{Total length}=5.5

Therefore, the total length of all the three planks is 5.5 m.

4 0
3 years ago
What is the 100th term of 6,10,14,18
Usimov [2.4K]

Answer:

406

Step-by-step explanation:

6+(4x100)

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • -81, 108, -144, 192, ...
    11·1 answer
  • Which expression is equivalent to –6(8 + 12)
    6·1 answer
  • How can you use that ordered pair to find the unit rate, or constant of proportionality?
    14·1 answer
  • 391.675 in expanded form
    6·2 answers
  • I need help with this
    15·1 answer
  • Need Help.
    8·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP!!!! WILL MARK BRAINLEST IF CORRECT
    7·1 answer
  • Could you please solve that?
    7·1 answer
  • A group of 19 boys and 18 girls are attending a pottery class. Each pottery table can seat 6 people.
    13·2 answers
  • I need help on these 2 questions how did I get it wrong? and for question 3 I'm not supposed to have the = sign so what am I sup
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!