Answer:
Congress i think
Explanation:
Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 states that "Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States ... excluding Indians not taxed." According to Story's Commentaries on the U.S. Constitution, "There were Indians, also, in several, and probably in most, of the states at that period, who were not treated as citizens, and yet, who did not form a part of independent communities or tribes, exercising general sovereignty and powers of government within the boundaries of the states."
Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution states that "Congress shall have the power to regulate Commerce with foreign nations and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes", determining that Indian tribes were separate from the federal government, the states, and foreign nations; and
The Fourteenth Amendment, Section 2 amends the apportionment of representatives in Article I, Section 2 above.
Answer:
I assume you are talking about the legal naturalization process.
Explanation:
Naturalization is the legal process a non-U.S. citizen undergoes to become a citizen of the United States. A person can become a citizen of the United States through one of the following ways: Through the naturalization process. By deriving citizenship from his or her parent when the parent naturalizes.
These legal requirements help the immigration service ensure that only those people who are sincere in their desire to become U.S. citizens become naturalized.
<em><u>now gimme brainliest >:3</u></em>
Answer:
As a judge, you should be required to pick from a limited range of sentences for each offense.
Explanation:
Some may argue that having passed a difficult bar exam to be licensed to practice law, spending years prosecuting or defending criminal cases, and being involved in thousands of criminal trials should qualify a judge to be free to make any sentencing decision they want—but this notion is incorrect.
Although judges tend to be extremely experienced and highly intelligent, granting judges too much leeway in sentencing decisions leads to issues like sentencing disparity (disproportionate sentencing in similar cases). Before the passage of the Sentencing Reform Act (SRA) in 1984, sentencing disparities within the United States justice system were largely unaddressed, so the SRA sought to address sentencing disparities with the imposition of mandatory sentencing guidelines for federal sentences. However, the SRA limited the power of judges to a great extent, an issue that would be addressed in the <em>United States v. Booker</em> (2005) Supreme Court case, with the court ruling the sentencing guidelines imposed by the SRA be deemed advisory rather than mandatory. What can be learned from these legal developments is that sentencing guidelines are necessary for reducing disparity within the justice system, but should remain advisory so as to not place any excessive limitations on the authority or sentencing liberty of judges.
The closest answer to the Supreme Court's legal precedent—our ideal in this case—would be picking from a limited range of sentences for each offense rather than having no limitations at all, as the latter would likely result in a return to the non-uniform, disparity-ridden justice system seen before the passage of the SRA.
Answer:
People should plant more trees because they give off oxygen. They also consume carbon dioxide some greenhouse gases which makes our air healthier and cools earths atmosphere.Instead of lowering these benefits by cutting trees down we should focus on planting more.Every year humans cut down about 3.5 to 7 billion trees.
Explanation:
Hope this is helpful! :)
Answer:
Economic itself deals with money, if there is some kind of new economic law it will affect us consumers because if we refer to the factors of production table, we can see that the producers rely on business firms and business firms rely on consumers for money. Furthermore looking into the current situation, most consumers are jobless leading the government to support them, and which leads to economic growth going further down( no money is coming in, it's just getting out) so this money is not replaced there for a country won't be able to sustain itself affecting us, consumers directly
