Answer:
Diversification for pooling risks
Explanation:
When a company wants to diversify it goes into various products in order to reach a larger market. This is the opposite of specialisation where the company focuses on one market or product.
When a company wants to diversify it will not be a good idea to do it because they want to pool risk.
Pooling of risk involves centralisation of process so that risk due to variability will be reduced.
Diversifying will increase risk due to variability.
Answer:
market penetration
Explanation:
According to my research on different business strategies, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is a market penetration growth strategy. Selling more of an established product or service to customers that already purchase the product is a market penetration growth strategy. This is the case as long as the product is not newly developed.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Marginal decisions involves considering the cost and benefit of taking a particular action. If the marginal benefit of taking a particular action exceeds the marginal cost, the activity should be undertaken
Answer:
An adjustment factor is determined by the 'Valuer-General'
Explanation:
adjustment Factors are resolved for all properties inside a civil territory. The Valuer-General may decide Alteration Factors for characterized classes of property on a district, territory, or group of localities basis within a premise inside a city territory. These are applied to government valuations currently in force.
In occurrences where a revaluation is being completed inside a metropolitan region, utilization of Adjustment Factors won't be fundamental as the revaluation itself will be utilized by the applicable experts in the figuring of rates and expenses.
Answer:
don't launch
Explanation:
Game theory looks at the interactions between participants in a competitive game and calculates the best choice for the player.
Dominant strategy is the best option for a player regardless of what the other player is playing.
Nash equilibrium is the best outcome for players where no player has an incentive to change their decisions.
The payoff matrix for this question is
Launch (in millions) Don't Launch (in millions)
Launch (in millions) $40, $40 $30, $45
Don't Launch (in millions) $45, $30 $50, $50
It can be seen that the best strategy for each firm is not to launch because the payoffs of not launching ($45, $50) is greater than the payoff of launching ($40, $30)