Answer:
Autocratic leadership has only one person that has the authority to make decisions and takes very little to no inputs from other groups, Democratic leadership allows everyone to participate in decision making.
Explanation:
Authoritarian leadership, also known as autocratic leadership, is a management style in <u>which an individual has total decision-making </u>power and absolute control.
Democratic management involves managers reaching decisions with the <u>input of the employees</u> but being responsible for making the final decision.
Answer:
The above statement is<u> true</u>.
Explanation:
As said in above statement , A will is the final declaration of how person desires to have her or his property disposed of after death and must follow exactly the requirements of state law to be effective. A will is good , as it express your feelings , that to whom you want to give your property after your death . It is always provided to that person you choose.
It protect your children from become homeless after your death. It also protect your property from being contested. A will is only valid if it is having number of years after the persons death.
A will should not include future plans, gifts and request , life insurance etc.
Answer:
Balance = $1,650
Explanation:
As Norma company has paid 4 months rent in advance, therefore at the end of June, norma company will record its 1-month expense as follows
Adjusting entry at the end of June would be
DEBIT CREDIT
Entry
Rent Expense $550
Prepaid Rent $550
The balance on Norma's prepaid expense would be
Prepaid Rent = $2200
Rent Expense = ($550)
Balance = $1,650
A. More education can help increase life expectancy. :)
Answer:
The Home owner commenced the action in a state A court ( C )
Explanation:
The Defendant ( the contractor) can decide to transfer the case from a state court to a federal court within the same state in which the case was filled by the The home owner if the federal court has the Jurisdiction to rule on the case
Since the contract was signed in state A under the laws of the state the case is definitely a state case and the Homeowner's move to remand the case to a state court with the argument that the Federal court lacks proper Jurisdiction is in order. The court decision on the matter will be based on the fact that the Homeowner commenced the action in a state A court where the contract was signed.