Answer:
The statement is missing. The statement is -- "A ray can be part of a line."
The answer is : The converse is not true, so Jahmiah is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
A conditional statement is represented by showing p → q. It means if p is correct or true, then q is also correct or true.
And the converse of p → q can be shown as q → p.
But we know that the converse of a statement is not always true, it may be true and may not be true.
In the context, the statement is " a ray can be a part of a line." And so the converse would be "A line can be a part of the ray".
So by definition we know that a line is continuous line having no end points, it extends in one direction. While a ray starts from a point and extends to infinity in one direction.
Thus ray is part of line but line is not a part of the ray. So the converse of the statement is not correct.
Hence, Jahmiah is correct.
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
I did it on paper
Answer:
2×5×7²
Step-by-step explanation:
You will start by using the factor tree.
490
^
2 245
^
5 49
^
7 7
Answer:
x + 48 +50 = 180 ( angle sum property of triangle)
x=180-98
<em>x=</em><em>8</em><em>2</em><em>°</em>
Answer:
x = 21
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Write the equation
(18 + 2x) ÷ 5 = 12
2. Multiply both sides by 5
18 + 2x = 60
3. Subtract 18 from both sides
2x = 42
4. Solve for x by dividing both sides by 2
x = 21
