The points you found are the vertices of the feasible region. I agree with the first three points you got. However, the last point should be (25/11, 35/11). This point is at the of the intersection of the two lines 8x-y = 15 and 3x+y = 10
So the four vertex points are:
(1,9)
(1,7)
(3,9)
(25/11, 35/11)
Plug each of those points, one at a time, into the objective function z = 7x+2y. The goal is to find the largest value of z
------------------
Plug in (x,y) = (1,9)
z = 7x+2y
z = 7(1)+2(9)
z = 7+18
z = 25
We'll use this value later.
So let's call it A. Let A = 25
Plug in (x,y) = (1,7)
z = 7x+2y
z = 7(1)+2(7)
z = 7+14
z = 21
Call this value B = 21 so we can refer to it later
Plug in (x,y) = (3,9)
z = 7x+2y
z = 7(3)+2(9)
z = 21+18
z = 39
Let C = 39 so we can use it later
Finally, plug in (x,y) = (25/11, 35/11)
z = 7x+2y
z = 7(25/11)+2(35/11)
z = 175/11 + 70/11
z = 245/11
z = 22.2727 which is approximate
Let D = 22.2727
------------------
In summary, we found
A = 25
B = 21
C = 39
D = 22.2727
The value C = 39 is the largest of the four results. This value corresponded to (x,y) = (3,9)
Therefore the max value of z is z = 39 and it happens when (x,y) = (3,9)
------------------
Final Answer: 39
out of these, it would be 4x - 4 * 2
Answer:
$8016.00
Step-by-step explanation:
I = 6000 × 0.042 × 8 = 2016
I = $ 2,016.00
$2,016.00 + $6,000.00 = 8,016.00
Answer:
60+2x≥300
Step-by-step explanation:
So we know that she makes a base of $60 a week and gets $2 extra for every item she sells. First, we set up an equation for how many items she would have to sell to make exactly $300 in a week. 60+2x=300. Now, all we do is replace the equal sign with a ≥ sign because it says at least which means more than or equal to.
