All categories

3 years ago

What can Lena do to avoid the risk of having short supplies in times of need?

Business

2 answers:

tino4ka555 [31]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Backup

Explanation:

evablogger [386]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Backup

Explanation:

Correct on Plato

You might be interested in

An agent does not like another broker and refuses to present his offers. The agent's employing broker notices he does a good job

Ivan

Answer:

Not ok and both broker and agent can be in trouble for lack of supervision

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this situation is not ok and both broker and agent can be in trouble for lack of supervision . This is because the agent and the employing broker are obligated to put the client's interests first and have no authority to withhold any offers from the client. That being said the employing broker also has the responsibility of supervising the employees and making sure that personal views do not affect the business decisions.

6 0

3 years ago

Dan Jacobs, production manager for GreenLife, invested in computer-controlled production machinery last year. He purchased th

gayaneshka [121]

Answer:

The pertinent focuses for Dan Jacobs choice are referenced beneath.

The new hardware would cost GreenLife $4,500,000
The new hardware would twofold the creation yield of the old apparatus

The expense of new hardware and the expansion in the creation yield by 100% are the future expenses and incomes and thus they are significant for dynamic.

The old apparatus is bought previously. Consequently, the price tag of the old apparatus is immaterial for dynamic procedure. Tho director ought to consider the resale estimation of old apparatus in the dynamic. Tho resale estimation of old apparatus ought to be deducted from the expense of new hardware so as to ascertain the net money surge to buy the new apparatus.

The director ought to set up an expense and advantage examination or ascertain NPV (net present estimation) of the venture (capital planning investigation) to introduce it before the leader of the organization. The extra costs identified with extra creation ought to likewise be thought of. This investigation would support the supervisor and the president in dissecting that whether they should buy the new machine or not.

4 0

3 years ago

The value of which of these expressions is closest to e?

coldgirl [10]

Answer: B

Explanation:

Therefor, value 2.659 is closest to the value of e

( I hope this helped of not I’m sorry)

6 0

2 years ago

Eve was stressed as she had got transferred to italy. she decided to look at the brighter side of her relocation by telling hers

mr_godi [17]

Answer:

Emotion-focused.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Master Hatter's demand for hats is 25,000 per year. The order cost is $425 and the carrying cost is $4.50 per unit. The cost pai

laiz [17]

Answer with its Explanation:

Part A. Economic order quantity Computation

Economic order quantity can be calculated by using the following formula:

EOQ = Squaroot of (2* D * S / H)

Here

Ordering cost per order is $425 which is S

Annual Holding cost per unit per year is $4.5 which is H

Annual Demand is 25000 Units

By putting values, we have:

EOQ = (2 * 25000 * $425 / $4.5) ^(1 / 2) = 2173 Hats

Part B.

Total Cost at EOQ = Purchasing Cost + Total Ordering cost + Holding Cost

By putting values, we have:

Total Cost = 25,000 Units * $25 per unit + ($25,000 / 2173 Hats) * $425 + (2173 Hats / 2) * $4.5 = $634,778 Annual Cost

Part C.

For ordering at-least 2000 units per order, the total cost would be:

Total Cost under 2000 order quantity = 25,000 * $25 per unit + (25000/2000) * $425 + (2000/2) * $4.5

Total Cost under 2000 order quantity = $634,813

By ordering at least 2000 hats will bring a loss of $35 ($634,778 - $634,813), hence Master Hatter must only order in EOQ.

6 0

3 years ago