<span>Experience teaches the things which a book can not teach. Thus, having extra work experience gives an edge to the person with higher experience with person with lesser experience. Lawrence's experience is more than his younger employees hence he knows various aspects of his work profile than the youngsters.</span>
Answer:
$110,400
Explanation:
The computation of the net non-current assets is shown below:
= Patent + Property, plant, and equipment - accumulated depreciation + trade marks + goodwill
= $7,900 + $98,900 - $20,000 + $13,600 + $10,000
= $110,400
Answer:
Correct option is B
$160,000
Explanation:
From the question above, Cost of goods sold of $160,000 is treated as a negative item in calculating gross income rather than as a deduction.
For a drug dealer like Tom, all deductions
listed above are disallowed.
Answer:
The correct answer is E. socially responsible
Explanation:
A company is socially responsible when it works attached to values and that within its business objectives includes supporting social, economic and environmental needs in order to optimize its competitive situation and its added value.
When a company is socially responsible, it does so by its own decision and not by taxation and its policies, strategies and practices are aimed at favoring its employees, suppliers, family, environment and environment.
The green paper of the European Commission states that "corporate social responsibility is the voluntary integration, by companies, of social and environmental concerns in their business operations and their relationships with all their partners."
Answer:
- <u><em>D. It has both good and bad effects, but we can't always predict what those are.</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
Explanation:
Of course, ethics mandates that the target of science and <em>new technology </em>should always pursue the good for humans; nevertheless, since time immemorial man has developed technology to make war. Thus, definetely, the first statement <em>"A It always does good for human"</em> is false.
Some other negative effects of <em>new technology</em>, like cars and nuclear power, have been harmful to the environment, but you cannot tell that this has always been so. Technology has also been developed to help the environment. For instance, panels to use solar energy do not harm the environment and seek to reduce fuel burning to help the environment. Thus, option <em>B, "It always ends up doing harm to the environment"</em> is false too.
Some of the damage that new technology can produce are not predicted both because the technology is new and because it may be used with different goals to those it was developed. This explains why option <em>C, It has many bad effects</em>, is false, and option <em>D, "It has both good and bad effects, but we can't always predict what those are", </em>is true.
