All categories

3 years ago

PLLLLLZZZZ III NNNEEEDDDD HEELPP

Mathematics

2 answers:

vekshin13 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps!

jeka943 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Y= 3x+10

Y= 1/2x+7

Y= 1/2x+4

Y= 4x-2

You might be interested in

Estimate the quotient to the nearest whole number by using compatible numbers 32.44 ÷ 4.36

GarryVolchara [31]

I'm pretty sure its 7

7 0

3 years ago

Complete the square <br> x^2+4-12=0

Tatiana [17]

Answer:

x = -6

x = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

x² + 4 - 12 = 0

= (x + 6)(x - 2)

x + 6 = 0

x = -6

x - 2 = 0

x = 2

5 0

3 years ago

Solve for x: -a + 3b > 5

Viefleur [7K]

Theres an app called photomath thats useful for these kinds of problems

8 0

3 years ago

Write 0.216 as a rational number in lowest terms

lozanna [386]

Answer:

$=\frac{27}{125}$

Step-by-step explanation:

$0.216$

$\mathrm{Multiply\:and\:divide\:by\:10\:for\:every\:number\:after\:the\:decimal\:point.}$

$\mathrm{There\:are\:}3\mathrm{\:digits\:to\:the\:right\:of\:the\:decimal\:point,\:therefore\:multiply\:and\:divide\:by\:}1000$

$=\frac{0.216\cdot \:1000}{1000}$

$=\frac{216}{1000}$

$216,\:1000$

$\mathrm{The\:GCD\:of\:}a,\:b\mathrm{\:is\:the\:largest\:positive\:number\:that\:divides\:both\:}a\mathrm{\:and\:}b\mathrm{\:without\:a\:remainder}$

$2,\:3\mathrm{\:are\:all\:prime\:numbers,\:therefore\:no\:further\:factorization\:is\:possible}$

$=2\cdot \:2\cdot \:2\cdot \:3\cdot \:3\cdot \:3$

$2,\:5\mathrm{\:are\:all\:prime\:numbers,\:therefore\:no\:further\:factorization\:is\:possible}$

$=2\cdot \:2\cdot \:2\cdot \:5\cdot \:5\cdot \:5$

$\mathrm{The\:prime\:factors\:common\:to\:}216,\:1000\mathrm{\:are\:}$

$=2\cdot \:2\cdot \:2$

$\mathrm{Multiply\:the\:numbers:}\:2\cdot \:2\cdot \:2=8$

$=8$

$=\frac{8\cdot \:27}{8\cdot \:125}$

$\mathrm{Cancel\:the\:common\:factor:}\:8$

$=\frac{27}{125}$

Hence, the correct answer is $=\frac{27}{125}$

6 0

3 years ago

HELP! IS THIS RIGHT?

svlad2 [7]

Yes, this is the right answer

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers