Step-by-step explanation:
First you need to get x on one side by subtracting it from either side
Second step the side you subtracted the x to you need to get rid of the number like the number 5
Third step you need to separate the number and x since they are being multiplied to be put together you need to do the opposite and divide on both sides
Answer:
A -1/2
b 3/-4
C -1/-5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
No it is not proportional
Step-by-step explanation:
You cant multiply each of the inputs by a constant number to get the output.
There is only 2 of them that you can, but the other 2 no. And you want he whole table so you need all of the inputs not just some. So no, its not proportional.
Hope this helped!
Yeah, I agree with letsgoplayd. Your answer doesn't make any sense because 8164 is not a decimal. But we can look at another example:
8164.45678
In this case, the number rounded to the 4th decimal point (ten thousandths) would be
8164.45680
Because the digit after the 7 is 8, we should round the "78" part to "80".
These two rules will help:
5 or more, raise the score (add 1 to the digit, and let the digit directly behind it become 0.)
4 or less, let it rest (keep the digit, and let the digit directly behind it turn to a 0.)
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
w=5
Step-by-step explanation:
using the distributive property to simplify the equation
-4(w)+1(-4)=-24 so
-4w-4=-24 (adding 4 to both sides)
-4w==20 (divide by -4)
w=5