How do you make a treaty stick? Let's offer a few factors.
1. The treaty needs to be ratified in each nation signing the treaty. Just because the American president, for example, signs a treaty somewhere doesn't mean it's automatically accepted back home. Pres. Woodrow Wilson signed the Treaty of Versailles, which included establishing the League of Nations after World War I. But back in the United States, the Congress rejected American involvement in the League of Nations.
2. Nations will be motivated to keep treaties their leaders sign because if they don't, the legitimacy of their nations and their leadership will be damaged. And other countries will see this as an excuse to break whatever other treaties they have with that nation.
3. There may be international sanctions or other measures that will negatively affect a nation if it breaks away from a treaty. Diplomats from the other nation might be withdrawn from the country, etc.
Ultimately, treaties are one nation's word to another. The only ultimate "guarantee" is that nations want their word, their guarantees, to be respected and honored. Violating treaties they have signed can deeply damage a nation's international reputation.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. Religious pluralism is described as when people of different religions or denominations co-exist peacefully.
Explanation:
Religious pluralism is a term used to refer to the conception of a peaceful relationship between different religions.
Authentic religious pluralism does not claim that all religions are equal. True pluralism recognizes diversity, difference, the right to think differently, otherness. That is why it accepts that different religions have different pretensions of truth. In this sense, true religious pluralism opposes both the violent imposition of a religion and the attempt to reduce all religions to a minimum common to all of them.
The Court said the right<span> to publish all </span>statements<span> is protected under the First Amendment. The Court also said in order to prove libel, a public official must </span>show<span>that what was said against them was made with actual malice – "that is, with knowledge that it was </span>false<span> or with reckless disregard for the truth."</span>
Answer:
c. United states, UK, and Soviet Union
Explanation:
looked it up on google
