1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stiks02 [169]
3 years ago
13

A person standing 20 feet from a streetlight casts a shadow as shown. How many times taller is the streetlight than the person?

Assume the triangles are similar.

Mathematics
1 answer:
alexandr402 [8]3 years ago
3 0
Attached solution and steps using proportions.

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!------- Ann sells boxes of cookies for $10 each. Abdul sells boxes of cookies for $8 each. Each of them sold t
madreJ [45]

Answer:

They both sold $40 worth of cookies.

Step-by-step explanation:

Using multiples the first multiple that 10 and 8 have in common is 40.

10,20,30,40

8,16,24,32,40

6 0
3 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
10
Margaret [11]

Answer:

y=3x+19.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) according to the condition the line 't' is parallel to the line 's', it means, the equation of the line 't' is: y=3x+C, where C - unknown number.

2) in order to calculate the 'C', it need to substitute the given coordinates into the equation of the line 't', then:

-2=3*(-7)+C, ⇒ C=19.

3) if C=19 and the equation of the line 't' was y=3x+C, then it is possible to make up the full required equation:

y=3x+19.

7 0
2 years ago
Find the perimeter of the colored part of the figure. The figure is composed of small squares with side-length 1 unit and curves
harina [27]

Answer:

16.56 in

Step-by-step explanation:

4 sides of the squares are exposed

The radius of each semicircle is 1 since they are against 2 squares.

2pi*r=circumfrence

2pi*1=6.28

6.28/2=3.14 because it's a semicircle

3.14*4=12.56 because there are 4 equal semicircles

12.56+4=16.56

4 0
3 years ago
What's 19/30 x 12/16?
mr Goodwill [35]
19/40 as a fraction and decimal it is 0.475
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which is the simplified form of the expression
    15·1 answer
  • 3x - 4y =7 solve for y
    9·2 answers
  • How many different ways can Kevin set the switches
    6·1 answer
  • For what value of n does 216^n-2/(1/36)^3n= 216
    9·2 answers
  • How to multiply these
    13·2 answers
  • Which expression is equivalent to x^-5/3​
    11·1 answer
  • A line has a slope of .25 and a y-intercept of − 3 . What is the equation of the line in standard form?
    10·1 answer
  • Can someone please answer my question? i have been working on school work all day.
    9·1 answer
  • Factor the expression: 4x + 16y + 8
    5·1 answer
  • An expression is a mathematical phrase. Expressions are different from equations because they do not have values on both sides o
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!