Answer:
If you try to lift up a weight in a swimming pool and then try to lift the same weight on the edge of the pool, it feels much lighter in the water.
This was supposed to have been first explained by the Greek scientist Archimedes. He said that the water gives an upward force or upthrust on any object in it.
You can weigh an object in air and then in water and actually work out the upthrust, it is the difference between the two readings. For this reason the upthrust is often called the loss in weight of the object.
Answer: that’s chemistry not physics
Explanation:
Well I don't know !
Let's work it out.
The gravitational force between two objects is
F = G · M₁·M₂ / R² .
'G' is the 'universal gravitational constant'. We could look it up.
'M₁' is the mass of one object
'M₂' is the mass of the other object
'R' is the distance between their centers.
It looks complicated, but stay with me. We can do this !
We know all the numbers, so we can calculate the force.
'G' is 6.67 x 10⁻¹¹ newton·meter² / kg² (I looked it up. You're welcome.)
'M₁' is 15 kg
'M₂' is 15 kg
'R' is 0.25 meter.
Now it's time to pluggum in.
F = G · M₁·M₂ / R²
= (6.67 x 10⁻¹¹ newton·meter² / kg²) · (15 kg) · (15 kg) / (0.25 m²)
= (6.67 x 10⁻¹¹ · 15 · 15 / 0.0625) N·m²·kg·kg / kg²·m²
= 2.4 x 10⁻⁷ Newton .
That a force equivalent to about 0.00000086 of an ounce.
This is the answer to part-a.
Concerning the answer to part-b ...
Personally, I could not detect this force, no matter what kind of equipment
I had. But I am just a poor schlepper engineer, educated in the last Century,
living out my days on Brainly and getting my kicks from YouTube videos.
I am not pushing the box to the envelope, or thinking outside the cutting
edge ... whatever.
I am sure there are people ... I can't name them, because they keep a
low profile, they stay under the radar, they don't attract a lot of media
attention, their work is not as newsworthy as the Kardashians, and plus,
they seldom call me or write to me ... but I know in my bones that there
are people who have measured the speed of light to NINE significant figures,
aimed a spacecraft accurately enough to take close-up pix of Pluto ten years
later, and detected gravity waves from massive blobs that merged 13 billion
years ago, and I tell you that YES ! THESE guys could detect and measure
a force of 0.86 micro-ounce if they felt like it !
To solve this problem we will apply the concepts related to magnetic flux and induced voltage. This last expression understood as the variation of the magnetic flux over time and, in turn, the magnetic flux expressed as the variation of the magnetic field in a certain area.
Magnetic flux through the circular coil is given as
The induced voltage is the change of the magnetic flux across the time, then
At the same time the magnetic flux through the square coil would be given as,
And the induced voltage EMF will be
Equating both expression we have
Therefore the emf induced in the square coil is 0.23355V
Answer:
Bank angle = 35.34o
Explanation:
Since the road is frictionless,
Tan (bank angle) = V^2/r*g
Where V = speed of the racing car in m/s, r = radius of the arc in metres and g = acceleration due to gravity in m/s^2
Tan ( bank angle) = 40^2/(230*9.81)
Tan (bank angle) = 0.7091
Bank angle = tan inverse (0.7091)
Bank angle = 35.34o
