Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Based on these observations, what type of subsistence pattern do you think this group is using, would be: the hunter-gathering system of subsistence.
Explanation:
The case being exposed in this question is the typical example of the nomadic hunter-gatherers. This group of people will tend to be small, and they will subsist entirely on the resources readily available to them from the land and the hunting they can make close to their place of habitation. They did not have a stable place of living and tended to move from place to place in search of new readily, and easily acquirable, resources. They literally depended on what they could gather from plants, and the animals they could hunt from the wild. They did not farm, establish stable dwellings and did not domesticate animals.
When testing a hypothesis using a null hypothesis, you use a statement that negates your hypothesis, and, within a certain level of certainty, see if the null hypothesis can be rejected. When testing the null hypothesis, you typically want to be around 95% sure that you can reject it (confidence interval is 95%).
In Rose's case, she is testing the hypothesis that there is a correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior.
Her null hypothesis would be:
"There is not a positive correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior"
or
"The correlation between watching violence on television and aggressive behavior is less than or equal to zero"
Answer:
accumulated knowledge and experience
Explanation:
Crystallized intelligence: In psychology, the term crystallized intelligence depends on the capabilities of an individual depending on experience and knowledge, for example, general information, analogies, vocabulary, etc.
Due to the presence of crystallized intelligence an individual can utilize formerly attained information, experience, knowledge, and facts.
Generally, different people to experience a decline in their crystallized intelligence as they age or grow up.
Answer:
<u>d. suggesting that our birth order shapes our personality</u>
Explanation:
- Alfred Adler, a friend of Freud, who followed the school of individuals psychology and he believed in the importance of social connections when seeing the childhood development and the emergence of social development.
- He claimed that older siblings who used to get the focus of their parent's attention have to share the attention when a new child joins the family.
- The youngest child according to Adler, gathers more attention thus leaving the middle child with less opportunity and later on gets reduced as the opportunities available to the older children.
- According, to his happiness of mankind lies in the fact of being together and concluded that the inferiority in childhood drives people to attempt to gain priority and is the force behind all of our thoughts, emotions, and behaviors.
Did you try looking it up?
