Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
Answer:
b) subjects agree to participate in a study after receiving complete information about the nature and purpose of the study.
Explanation:
In research, the term informed consent refers to the process in which researchers get a voluntary agreement from participants of the study where they state they are willing to participate on it.
This consent involves informing the subjects about their rights, the procedures they will undergone to, the purpose of the study and the risks and benefits they might have. However, in this consent the researchers <u>do not disclose the hypothesis of the study because this might put in risk the results of the study </u>(since participants might change their behavior due to this).
Therefore, the correct answer is that informed consent means that b) subjects agree to participate in a study after receiving complete information about the nature and purpose of the study.
Answer:
A the mass of the object is too small
Explanation:
If the masses of the objects are too small, then the interaction between the two is hard to detect.
Hope this helps! I tried my best!
Hello There!
<em>Siblings play a role in influencing the MICROSYSTEM in Bronfenbrenner’s ecological model.</em>
