C = 1.6b
c + b = 442
1.6b + b = 442
2.6b = 442
b = 442 / 2.6
b = 170 <== Boston
c = 1.6b
c = 1.6(170)
c = 272 <== Colorado Springs
Answer:
B) -3/2
Step-by-step explanation:
If [x/2]=0 then x/2 is a number such that the least integer greater than or equal to x/2 is 0. We can rewrite this as the inequality x/2≤0. Then, the value of x in C, D and E is wrong because they are positive numbers, then x/2 would be a positive number which contradicts this inequality.
Now, 0 is the least integer that satisfies this inequality, therefore we cannot have that x/2≤-1 since -1 is an integer and -1<0. Then x/2>-1. This discards A as wrong, because for x=-2, x/2=-1, contrary to x/2>-1.
Thus B is the right answer. To verify, if x=-3/2, then x/2=-3/4 and we have that -1<-3/4≤0 as required.
I found the corresponding image. Pls. see attachment.
<span>The minimum number of rigid transformations required to show that polygon ABCDE is congruent to polygon FGHIJ is
2 (translation and rotation). A
rotation translation must be used to make the two polygons coincide.
A sequence of transformations of polygon ABCDE such that ABCDE does not coincide with polygon FGHIJ is
a translation 2 units down and a 90° counterclockwise rotation about point D </span>
Answer:
9
Step-by-step explanation:
9.
y coordinate gives the vertical distance