Isotopes _____ at very different rates.

A pitcher can throw a baseball at about 90 miles/hour (about 39.6 m/s). What is the ratio of the kinetic energy to the rest ener

tester [92]

Answer:

$8.71*10^{-15}$

Explanation:

The rest energy is the energy associated with the base ball at zero velocity which is expressed as

$Rest energy=mc^{2}\\$

Note: the speed C is the speed of light which is expressed as 3*10^8

while the kinetic energy is the energy associated with the ball during its motion and is expressed as

$Kinetic energy=1/2mv^{2}$

the ratio can be expressed as

$\frac{Kinetic Energy}{Rest Energy}=\frac{\frac{1}{2}mv^{2} }{mc^{2}}\\since V=39.6m/s\\C=3*10^{8}m/s\\\frac{Kinetic Energy}{Rest Energy}=\frac{\frac{1}{2}39.6^{2} }{(3*10^8)^{2}} \\\frac{Kinetic Energy}{Rest Energy}=\frac{784.08}{9*10^{16}} \\\frac{Kinetic Energy}{Rest Energy}=8.71*10^{-15}$

5 0

4 years ago

¿Qué magnitudes piensan que se relacionan mediante el<br> concepto de rapidez?

iragen [17]

La rapidez es una magnitud escalar que relaciona la distancia recorrida con el tiempo.

La velocidad es una magnitud vectorial que relaciona el cambio de posición (o desplazamiento) con el tiempo.

4 0

3 years ago

Two identical speakers are emitting a constant tone that has a wavelength of 0.50 m. Speaker A is located to the left of speaker

Marianna [84]

Answer:

a) and c).

Explanation:

For a complete destructive interference occur, it must be met the following condition relating the wavelength, and the difference in the paths taken by the sound emitted by the sources until arriving to the listening point:

d = |dA- dB| = (2n-1)*(λ/2)

For n= 1, d = λ/2 = 0.25 m, it doesn't meet any of the cases.

For n=2, d= 3*(λ/2) = 0.75 m

In the case a) we have dA = 2.15 m and dB = 3.00 m, so dB-dA = 0.75 m, which means that in the location stated by case a) a complete destructive interference would occur.

For n=3, d= 5*(λ/2) = 5*0.25 m = 1.25 m.

This is just the case c) because we have dA = 3.75 m and dB = 2.50 m, so dA-dB = 1.25 m, which means that in the location stated by case c) a complete destructive interference would occur also.

The remaining cases don't meet the condition stated above, so the statements found to be true are a) and c),

5 0

4 years ago

Do two bodies have to be in physical contact to exert a force upon one another?

Mekhanik [1.2K]

The correct answer to the statement " Do two bodies have to be in physical contact to exert a force upon one another " is:

No, the gravitational force is a field force and does not require physical contact to exert

a force.

The correct option is a.

<h3>Why two bodies do not have to be in physical contact to exert a force upon one another as a result of gravitational force.</h3>

It has been practically proven that two bodies can exert a force upon each other even if there is no physical contact between them. This can as a result of gravity.

That being said, a magnetic attraction can also exert a force between two different bodies upon one another.

So therefore, it can be deduced from above that two different bodies do not have to be in physical contact before they exert a force upon one another.