The answer is Pessimistic Explanatory Style.
Pessimists have the opposite explanatory style for they blame themselves for things with bad luck that happens and thinks that the cause was something permanent. But, when something good happens, they tend to connect and depend it to luck and see the cause as a temporary case only.
mainly true but they learned about both. so, do what you will. both could be correct?
Answer: b. Denies enforceability to certain contracts that are not in writing
Explanation:
The statute of Fraud advocate for contracts to be in writing to avoid people to being robbed or mislead by a fraudulent party.
Substantive disagreement may never be resolved because it leads to clashes of opinions.
A disagreement or argument is said to be substantial if it centers on the presentation of divergent viewpoints regarding the truth or the adherence to opposing ideals.
There must be a means to distinguish substantive disagreement (SD) from conceptual disagreement if legal concepts can be the subject of SD. Arguments that persons debating a certain philosophical problem are only having a linguistic argument are one approach to reject the substantiveness of the issue. For instance, it has been argued that the seeming conflict over the mind/brain identity thesis is only a word one and that there is no real controversy over whether or not mental traits are the same as neurological ones.
To know more about Substantive disagreement refer to:
brainly.com/question/28085499
#SPJ1
