Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Answer: Life is difficult because humans things that we must do takes time and effort to do them and to get them done, the other reason is that because that that is hard is because we need an intellectual challenge so we can learn and get things done.
I think I may be a little bit off on this. Okay WAY off but please don't report me if this IS wrong.
Answer:The problem that was better defined was that of shortening the amount of tme students wait in the lunch line.
Explanation:
The second problem was not well defined because the school spirit can be increased in a vast number of ways which the class didn't mention any.
Therefore todefine the second problem, the class has to state a specified area in the which they want to tackle in other to incresa the spirit of the school just like the first class has specifically stated that it is the time student wait in lunch line they want to shorten.
A well defined problem will be more easier to solve than the one which is not defined.
Answer:
Low levels of fecal coliform?
Explanation:
I'm not exactly sure but the water quality isn't really as sophisticated as much else.
Hello There!
<span>Even though Texas executes more people than any other state, its murder rate is above the national average.
</span>
Answer: True.
Hope This Helps You!
Good Luck :)
- Hannah ❤
