Answer: hypnosis, meditation, hallucination, trance, and the dream stage
Explanation:
Altered state of consciousness includes various mental states which the mind can be aware of but it's not in it's usual wakeful conditions such as during hypnosis, meditation, hallucination, trance, and the dream stage
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's the office because many more people today talk about the office than parks and rec. So, I believe that because more people talk about the office, more people watch it.
<u>Answer:
</u>
The newspaper editor could be convicted of violating the Sedition Act.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The United States government, in an attempt to limit the negative word being spread about the functioning of the government, expanded the girth of the Espionage Act of 1917 to include anti-government speech and published writings into the list of crimes under the said act.
- This move came in during World War I as the number of individuals criticizing the decision of the government to participate in the war was increasing considerably.
- The act was named by the government as the 'Sedition Act of 1918'.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
