Answer:
<em>Translate the parent function, 2 units upward</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
Given

See attachment for the graph
Required
Determine the change in f(x) that gives the dashed line
Let the dash line be represented with g(x)
From the attachment, there is only one transformation from f(x) to the g(x).
When f(x) is translated 2 units vertically upwards
, it gives g(x); the dash line.
If
Then g(x) is:

True!! They do reviews on over 7 million accommodations :)
Trash collection is the process of collection and removal of garbage. It does not get affect by big data analytics. Thus, the correct option is A). Trash collection.
<h3>What is the significance of the trash collection?</h3>
Trash collection is the process of the collection and removal of garbage. It is the act of picking up or collecting the garbages from various places.
Trash collection plays a very significant role in the environment. Proper garbage collection and disposal facilitates the recycling process, lessens the impact on landfills, and protects the environment by controlling the pollutants that are released.
Basically, trash collection is a part of the process of waste management.
Learn more about trash collection here:-
brainly.com/question/21865424
#SPJ4
Answer:
839.216
Explanation:
For we to calculate the total cost, we use the following
Total Cost = Carrying Cost + Stock out Cost
= 0+ $45 x 4 x [.2(100-80)+.2(120-80)+.1(140-80)] = 1368*
Now
Total Cost = Carrying Cost + stock out Cost
Total cost= [10 x 20]+40 x 4 x [.2990-50-20)+.1(110-50-20)]
Total cost = 200-1115.216+4
Total cost = 839.216
Answer:
The correct answer is B. result from the political bias toward immediate benefits and deferred costs.
Explanation:
While many people run hysterically on the streets begging politicians to act in the face of the threat of climate change, many people, young and old, may be demanding the same type of action, but to fix the unfunded passive systems.
By extending eligibility and increasing the benefits of a pay-per-use system while at the same time having fewer children to finance it, previous generations have left a fearsome financial obligation. Either taxes will increase dramatically for tomorrow's workers, lowering their standard of living, or benefits will fall for tomorrow's retirees, lowering their standard of living. A group will feel very angry.
These problems were anticipated even when politicians were raising payments, but each elected government simply kicked the can and allowed things to continue as usual.
Social security systems and pension funds are actuarially not funded systems. There is no obligation for this generation to have children at the same rate as previous generations. Therefore, when those born in the 1950s reach retirement age in the next century, their stipends will feel more like a burden due to the ranks of non-active members of society that will depend on their contributions to live.