Answer:
rE = 0.1486 or 14.86%
Explanation:
The expected rate of return of a stock is the mean return that is expected to be earned by the stock considering the different scenarios that can occur, the return in these scenarios and the probability of the occurrence of these scenarios. The formula for expected rate of return of stock is,
rE = pA * rA + pB * rB + ... + pN * rN
Where,
- pA, pB, ... represents the probability that scenario A, B and so on will occur or the probability of each scenario
- rA, rB, ... represents the return in scenario A, B and so on
rE = 0.21 * 0.2 + 0.72 * 0.15 + 0.07 * -0.02
rE = 0.1486 or 14.86%
Answer:
The correct answer is option c.
Explanation:
An increase in the price of oil will cause the quantity demanded of a commodity to decline and the quantity supplied to increase. This will cause a surplus in the market.
There will be no change in the demand and supply curve.
This is because of the law of demand and supply.
According to the law of demand, the price of a commodity is inversely related to the quantity demanded of the commodity, while other factors are kept constant.
Similarly, the law of supply states that the price of a commodity is positively related to the quantity demanded of a commodity.
The demand and supply curves are not affected by the changes in price, they change as a result of changes in other factors.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": are essential to the reallocation of resources from less desired to more desired goods.
Explanation:
Economic profit is the difference between the company's profits from revenue and the overall opportunity cost. The difference between accounting profit and economic profit is significant. Only total revenue minus the explicit cost of producing goods or services is considered to calculate the accounting profit.
The economic profit is called a loss if after subtracting the opportunity costs from revenue the figure is negative. <em>Both profit or losses determine how resources will be allocated in a company prioritizing the more desired goods or those who are needed for the firm's operations.</em>
Ken, the agent, violated the law of agency
In this particular instance, when Ken told the the buyer that the seller would take a lower price than what was on the listing in order to close the sale faster and then told the buyer exactly which price they should offer, Ken, who is the agent, has now violated the law of agency