Since
, we can rewrite the integral as

Now there is no ambiguity about the definition of f(t), because in each integral we are integrating a single part of its piecewise definition:

Both integrals are quite immediate: you only need to use the power rule

to get
![\displaystyle \int_0^11-3t^2\;dt = \left[t-t^3\right]_0^1,\quad \int_1^4 2t\; dt = \left[t^2\right]_1^4](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%20%5Cint_0%5E11-3t%5E2%5C%3Bdt%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5Bt-t%5E3%5Cright%5D_0%5E1%2C%5Cquad%20%5Cint_1%5E4%202t%5C%3B%20dt%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5Bt%5E2%5Cright%5D_1%5E4)
Now we only need to evaluate the antiderivatives:
![\left[t-t^3\right]_0^1 = 1-1^3=0,\quad \left[t^2\right]_1^4 = 4^2-1^2=15](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5Bt-t%5E3%5Cright%5D_0%5E1%20%3D%201-1%5E3%3D0%2C%5Cquad%20%5Cleft%5Bt%5E2%5Cright%5D_1%5E4%20%3D%204%5E2-1%5E2%3D15)
So, the final answer is 15.
Her work is incorrect because she accidentally changed -14 to -7 in the second step.
Working it out from the top we get
(x-14)+11=x-(x-4)
x-14+11=x-x+4
x-3=0+4
Final answer:
x=7
Hope I helped :)
The coefficient of y∧15×∧2 in expansion of (y∧3+x)∧7 is (15×2)+(3×7)= 51
Plug in the points and see if y and x are equal to each other.
(2,3)
y= x-1
3= 2-1
3= 1 (not the solution)
y=3x
3=3*3
3=9 (not the solution)
y=x+1
3=2+1
3=3 (solution) We can check to make sure.
y=-3x
3=-3*3
3=-9 (not the solution)
y=x+1 <em>is the answer.
</em>
I hope this helps!
~kaikers
Answer: 2-6p-6q-18
Step-by-step explanation: