Answer: 25.22%
Explanation:
Given that,
Annual revenue = $134,000
Annual expenses = $76,000
Oil well cost = $449,000
Salvage value = $11,000
Annual net income = Annual revenue - Annual expenses
= $134,000 - $76,000
= $58000
Average Investment = 
= $230000
Annual rate of return = 
= 25.22%
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The impact of corruption and fraud on an individual is numerous, whether it is coming from a company or a state.
Usually, the impact of corruption and fraud on individuals makes such individuals have a wrong perception of the situation.
If the individual is at the wrong end of corruption and fraud, such individual would miss many opportunities, including access to employment, good health care systems, be exposed to the inefficient quality of standard of living, and many more. Hence, such an individual would believe that little to nothing works in his immediate environment.
In the same vein, if such an individual is gaining from fraud and corruption, he would believe the situations are right for him, and that it is perfectly normal to cheat, lie, and bribe his way through to success. Hence, such an individual would see the world as the best fraudster or most corrupt rules the world and it would be a normal thing to him.
Answer:
a sample from workers who had contact with the customers already
Answer:
It is convenient to make the changes.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Selling price= $57.60 per unit.
Direct materials= $22
Direct labor= $24
Variable overhead= $11.00
Fixed overhead= $11.00.
New costs:
Direct material cost= 22*1.2= $26.4
Direct labor cost= 24*1.2= $28.8
<u>I suppose that the selling price will increase by $40.</u>
To determine whether the changes increase profit or not, we need to calculate the unitary contribution margin per unit for both options:
Contribution margin= selling price - unitary variable cost
Actual Contribution margin:
Contribution margin= 57.6 - (22 - 24 - 11)= 0.6
New contribution margin:
Contribution margin= 97.60 - (26.4 - 28.8 - 11)= $31.4
