Is there supposed to be a picture??
Answer:
im not shere but i think its D on ege
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
an = -3 · an - 1 where a1 = -1.
Step-by-step explanation:
The first term a1 = -1 and the common ratio is -3 so ecah term is formed form the previous one by multiplying by -3.
The group paid $ 5250 at first city and $ 6250 at second city
<u>Solution:</u>
Let x = the charge in 1st city before taxes
Let y = the charge in 2nd city before taxes
The hotel charge before tax in the second city was $1000 higher than in the first
Then the charge at the second hotel before tax will be x + 1000
y = x + 1000 ----- eqn 1
The tax in the first city was 8.5% and the tax in the second city was 5.5%
The total hotel tax paid for the two cities was $790
<em><u>Therefore, a equation is framed as:</u></em>
8.5 % of x + 5.5 % of y = 790

0.085x + 0.055y = 790 ------- eqn 2
<em><u>Let us solve eqn 1 and eqn 2</u></em>
<em><u>Substitute eqn 1 in eqn 2</u></em>
0.085x + 0.055(x + 1000) = 790
0.085x + 0.055x + 55 = 790
0.14x = 790 - 55
0.14x = 735
<h3>x = 5250</h3>
<em><u>Substitute x = 5250 in eqn 1</u></em>
y = 5250 + 1000
<h3>y = 6250</h3>
Thus the group paid $ 5250 at first city and $ 6250 at second city
The correct answer is B. I figured this out by testing out coordinates into each equation. I am only going to show my work for equation B though... if you want to see the rest of my work, message me.
(0,0) ⇒ this point is within the shaded part of the graph
0 ≤ 1/2(0) + 3
0 ≤ 0 + 3
0 ≤ 3
True
(1,4) ⇒ this point is within the unshaded region
4 ≤ 1/2(1) + 3
4 ≤ 1/2 + 3
4 ≤ 3.5
False
This proves that equation B matches the graph shown.