Answer:
PART A:
PETER
PART B:
GIWA
PART C:
WEEK 10
Step-by-step explanation:
PART A:
Peter saves $10 every week why GIWA saves $10 every two weeks making it $5 every week.
PART B:
GIWA started with more money. He started with $ 70 why Peter started with $20
PART C:
They both had $120 in the tenth week
Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:

The alternative hypothesis is:

If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
The number of situps form an AP with first term (a) = 17 and common difference (d) = 4
Tn = a + (n - 1)d
T12 = 17 + (12 - 1) x 4 = 17 + 11(4) = 17 + 44 = 61
Therefore, she will do 61 situps on day 12.
The least common denominator for the question you have supplied me with is 10. The least common multiple of the denominators, 5 and 10, is 10, making the LCD 10.