Answer:
I'm not an expert here, this is a best guess!
But I would say if there is no chance that of him incurring excess costs of less than $500, then he knows without insurance he'll end up paying at least $500, possibly more out of pocket, without the insurance.
so I would say He ends up spending the least amount out if pocket by going with option A. for $75. that's $75 out of pocket with no deductible and it covers his $500+ in excess costs....B and C would also cover the excess, but would each cost $140 or $275 out of pocket at the end of the day....
with that being said, I'd say it's worth it to buy the insurance....even if he doesn't have any excess costs, he's spent $75 dollars for the peace of mind to know he's covered either way, and if he does incur the excess costs he's spent $75 rather that $500+....Even if the excess charges are only $100, which it says there is no chance of happening, but still, then he's still saved $25 altogether. Unless I'm reading it wrong, Option A saves him the most money either way, and is worth it to buy the insurance!
If p(x) is a function, then a real-world example might be
The amount of fish food, in grams required for the giant koi fish in the pond can be represented by the function
. If there are 50 fish, how many grams of fish food will you need?
Answer:
A/15=5
so multiply 15*5
you would get 75
therefore a=75
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The equation is in the form y=mx+b, where m=slope, b=y-intercept.
The y-intercept is 35: so the line goes through the y-axis at (0,35).
The slope is 25: so we need to count out the slope as rise over run, or 25 up and 1 to the right, starting from the y-intercept.
Answer:
y = -3, -4
Step-by-step explanation:
Formula is (b/2)^2
So...
(y+7/2)^2 - 1/4 = 0
Add 1/4 to each side
(y+7/2)^2 = 1/4
Square root...
y+7/2 = +-1/2
Add
y = -3, -4
