- to form a lasting peace with just treaty terms
-
to establish trade barriers as an economic means of punishing aggressive countries.
Then-president of the United States, Woodrow Wilson, made a proposal that aimed to resolve the issue definitively. For him, it was more important to seal peace and prevent another war than to point out punishments for losers and compensations for winners. In other words, the US president embraced a kind of "peace without winners."
Answer:
The correct answer is B.bargain in order to obtain the property rights of the gopher habitat.
Explanation:
In economics, the Coase Theorem states that in a market where transaction costs are negligible, a dispute between parties where property rights are involved will lead to a bargaining process where the party that gives the most value to whatever it's in dispute will end up winning rights over that property. In this case, the environmental group assigns great value to protecting the habitat of the Wyoming pocker gopher, but they can only fully secure its well-being by securing property rights over said habitat, and given their standing, they can expect to bargain or negotiate successfully. Any other option, like protesting, boycotting, or lobbying, won't be good enough to achieve their goals.
8:09 in the west, 10:09 in the south and 11:09 in the east
B. A treatment's effects spreading from the experimental group to the control group.
<h3>Why would a control condition be used in an experiment?</h3>
When conducting an experiment, a control is a factor that doesn't change or is unaffected by other factors. It acts as a benchmark or point of comparison against which other test results are assessed.
The spread of the treatment from the experimental group to the control group is referred to as diffusion, and it has the effect of minimizing the difference between the two situations. When a group that has not previously received therapy hears about the care the other group is receiving, it expects the same or comparable care.
To know more about experimental group visit:-
brainly.com/question/23389356
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
No, this is not true. An instigator is someone who “feeds the fire” or fuels the conflict and makes the problem worse. A pacifist is the opposite, someone who puts out the fire or lessens the comflict.
