1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
blsea [12.9K]
3 years ago
14

In September, Amina hired Bryan as a delivery man. Bryan was to commence work on 1 November. On 1 October, Amina wrote to Bryan

telling him that, despite their agreement, economic circumstances were such that she no longer required his services. Can Bryan sue Amina? Explain your answers in light of the principles learned on breach of contract.
Law
1 answer:
Tcecarenko [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: The answer is explained below

Explanation:

A layoff is a termination of an employment at the employer's will. A layoff may be either temporary or permanent and can occur for reasons such as new technology, downsizing, or changes in market conditions. In this case with regards to the question, Amina told Bryan that his service is no longer needed due to an economic circumstances. While accepting and signing a job offer, there are legal agreement which has to be made.

Here,an anticipatory breach occurs when Amina states, in advance of the due date that Bryan was meant to start the job that she intends not fulfilling the agreement of having him as a delivery man.

In this situation, Bryan can't sue Amina because it wasn't her fault that an economic situation arises. If he had left a previous job to take Amina's offer, that could have been a different case.

According to the labour welfare law, in case any employer rejects the job offer the individual can raise a concern against him. An economic conditions can come up anytime so Bryan shouldn't sue Amina.

You might be interested in
Where does the CEO Of Racism lives?
Otrada [13]

Answer: The Ceo of racism lives in alabama. Brainliest?

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which act restricted trade practices that sought to eliminate competition or encourage monopoly?
san4es73 [151]

Answer:

The (B) Sherman Antitrust Act restricted trade practices that sought to eliminate competition or encourage monopoly.

  • This act made this illegal and you could be arrested.
  • The main purpose of this act was to conserve competition is business.

I hope this helped at all.

6 0
2 years ago
Who has chegg please answer i need answers​
sukhopar [10]

Answer:

What?

I need answers

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following would involve civil law, but not criminal law?
grin007 [14]
B would be your answer!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What happens to any criminal evidence that is<br> obtained before Miranda rights are read?
ycow [4]
It’s gone. can’t use it.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the significance of the NAPOLCOM in the operation of the PNP
    7·1 answer
  • Did Carole baskin killed her husband
    5·2 answers
  • Directions: Summarize the main ideas of this lesson by answering the question below.
    9·1 answer
  • Which set of events is listed in chronological order?A.The Equal Opportunity Employment Commission rules that transgender people
    8·1 answer
  • Vhat made Alexander Maconochie a good judge of prison life?
    10·1 answer
  • A State A citizen and a State B citizen were in a car accident in State A. The State A citizen filed a negligence action in a St
    10·1 answer
  • Alcohol is implicated in a very large amount of road collisions because it leads to slow reflexes problems with vision and loss
    6·2 answers
  • It's impossible to pick out a drunk driver until it is too late.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    7·2 answers
  • The jury in Dare County finds a defendant guilty of burglary in the second degree. The defendant maintains their innocence and d
    7·1 answer
  • This one of my favriot memes, whats yours?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!