Chuck bought 19 movie tickets for $174.50.

Which is equivalent to 10(-2 2/5)

snow_lady [41]

Answer:

Which? Im guessing theres options, can you say the options?

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Can anyone please help with this question?

vitfil [10]

The middle section is n(n+1)

The top row is n+2

The bottom row is 2n+1

So the rule for the total number of tiles will be the sum of the above rules...

s(n)=n(n+1)+n+2+2n+1

s(n)=n^2+n+n+2+2n+1

s(n)=n^2+4n+3

6 0

3 years ago

3. 18 is 40% of what number?

Mariulka [41]

#Lets just write x as the nunber you asked

x × 40/100 = 18

x = 18 : 40/100

x = 18 × 100/40

y = 1800/40

y = 45

<h3>Answer : 45</h3>

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help me to solve this

natka813 [3]

5) all you have to do is calculate which would be 2.9166...
6) 65.898

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Evaluate the surface integral S F · dS for the given vector field F and the oriented surface S. In other words, find the flux of

tresset_1 [31]

Because I've gone ahead with trying to parameterize $S$ directly and learned the hard way that the resulting integral is large and annoying to work with, I'll propose a less direct approach.

Rather than compute the surface integral over $S$ straight away, let's close off the hemisphere with the disk $D$ of radius 9 centered at the origin and coincident with the plane $y=0$ . Then by the divergence theorem, since the region $S\cup D$ is closed, we have

$\displaystyle\iint_{S\cup D}\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec S=\iiint_R(\nabla\cdot\vec F)\,\mathrm dV$

where $R$ is the interior of $S\cup D$ . $\vec F$ has divergence

$\nabla\cdot\vec F(x,y,z)=\dfrac{\partial(xz)}{\partial x}+\dfrac{\partial(x)}{\partial y}+\dfrac{\partial(y)}{\partial z}=z$

so the flux over the closed region is

$\displaystyle\iiint_Rz\,\mathrm dV=\int_0^\pi\int_0^\pi\int_0^9\rho^3\cos\varphi\sin\varphi\,\mathrm d\rho\,\mathrm d\theta\,\mathrm d\varphi=0$

The total flux over the closed surface is equal to the flux over its component surfaces, so we have

$\displaystyle\iint_{S\cup D}\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec S=\iint_S\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec S+\iint_D\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec S=0$

$\implies\boxed{\displaystyle\iint_S\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec S=-\iint_D\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec S}$

Parameterize $D$ by

$\vec s(u,v)=u\cos v\,\vec\imath+u\sin v\,\vec k$

with $0\le u\le9$ and $0\le v\le2\pi$ . Take the normal vector to $D$ to be

$\vec s_u\times\vec s_v=-u\,\vec\jmath$

Then the flux of $\vec F$ across $S$ is

$\displaystyle\iint_D\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec S=\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^9\vec F(x(u,v),y(u,v),z(u,v))\cdot(\vec s_u\times\vec s_v)\,\mathrm du\,\mathrm dv$

$=\displaystyle\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^9(u^2\cos v\sin v\,\vec\imath+u\cos v\,\vec\jmath)\cdot(-u\,\vec\jmath)\,\mathrm du\,\mathrm dv$

$=\displaystyle-\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^9u^2\cos v\,\mathrm du\,\mathrm dv=0$

$\implies\displaystyle\iint_S\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec S=\boxed{0}$

8 0

3 years ago