The correct answer is:
To leave the economy alone
Laissez-faire, is a French phrase that means "let (it/them) do" or "let go". It is an economic system in which regulation, privileges, tariffs and subsidies between private parties are free from government intervention. The idea came from the economist and philosopher Adam Smith, he stated that the economy's equilibrium will be obtained when the government minimizes intervention. Thus he believed the government’s role in laissez-faire capitalism was to leave the economy alone.
Because he said that he wasn't fit to be president and never should have been
Answer:
<u>Melchora Aquino was captured and exiled in Guam for helping the kapituneros</u>
Explanation:
Melchora is often called the ''mother of the Philippines revolution'' or ''Tandang Sora''
She is held in high-esteem all over the country and her struggle is still celebrated today.
While she was born into an ordinary family and lived a completely normal life, things changed when she opened a store in her own village. This place gradually became a refuge for rebels fighting against the occupation.
Apart from food and shelter, she was seen as a motherly figure by many in the revolution who would meet her for prayers and blessings.
The Spanish got to know about her actives and when she refused to give information, she was exiled to Guam, only to return when the Americans came in.
Answer:
<u>Graph C </u> represents the population with disruptive selection.
Explanation:
Disruptive selection describes changes in population genetics in which extreme values for a trait are favored over intermediate ones. Therefore, the population is divided in two distint groups. This is what causes the graph to look like graph C.
I can't really answer your question (as I don't really know enough about 18th century France), but I just want to clear up an (understandable) misconception about Feudalism in your question.
The French revolution was adamant and explicit in its abolition of 'feudalism'. However, the 'feudalism' it was talking about had nothing at all to do with medieval 'feudalism' (which, of course, never existed). What the revolutionaries had in mind, in my own understanding of it, was the legally privileged position of the aristocracy/2nd estate. This type of 'feudalism' was a creation of early modern lawyers and, as a result, is better seen as a product of the early-modern monarchical nation-state, than as a precursor to it. It has nothing to do with the pre-nation-state medieval period, or with the Crusades.
Eighteenth-century buffs, feel free to chip in if I've misrepresented anything, as this is mostly coming from my readings about the historiographical development of feudalism, not any revolutionary France expertise, so I may well have misinterpreted things.
