The inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
<h3>What do you mean by inverse?</h3>
Inverse of the statement means that explain the condition in reverse way or vice versa.
Since, M is the midpoint of PQ, then PM is congruent to QM.
Proving in reverse way, let m be the point between P and Q the distance M from P is equal to the distance from M to Q. Which implies that M lies as the mid of the P and Q.
Thus, the inverse of the statement is M be the point on PQ since PM is congruent to QM than M is midpoint on the PQ.
Learn more about inverse here:
brainly.com/question/5338106
#SPJ1
Answer:
see explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
The sum of the interior angles of a polygon is
sum = 180° (n - 2) ← n is the number of sides
The polygon here has 8 sides, that is n = 8, thus
sum = 180° × 6 = 1080°
Sum the given angles and equate to 1080, that is
14x + 133 + 167 + 138 + 18x + 115 + 151 + 120 = 1080
32x + 824 = 1080 ( subtract 824 from both sides )
32x = 256 ( divide both sides by 32 )
x = 8
Thus the 2 unknown angles are
14x = 14 × 8 = 112°
18x = 18 × 8 = 144°
The answer is 0.806 I believe. The whole process was far too much to type onto hear because I don't want you to be reading an essay if you're in a hurry.
