Answer:
B) trust.
Explanation:
In psychology, the term "trust" is being used by Erik Erikson in his psychosocial development. It is being used in the first stage of the theory named "trust versus mistrust".
According to Erikson, if a child's need is being fulfilled, and he or she receives the care and love which is therefore reliable, consistent, and persistent then the child will gain or develop a "sense of trust" on his or her caregivers or parents that will further help the child to gain insight for another relationship as well and feels secure if threatened.
In the question above, the given statement states that Jessica will resolve the first crisis of trust.
Answer:
<h3>Legally insane.</h3>
Explanation:
A court may declare a defendant legally insane if he/she pass a series of insanity tests. It includes the "M'Naghten Rule" test, the "Irresistible Impulse" Test,The "Durham Rule" and The "Model Penal Code" Test for Legal Insanity.
A court may allow an insanity defense if the defendant can prove to the court that he/she did not understand what they did, failed to understand right from wrong, was unable to control impulse due to mental disease or some other factors which resulted from mental instability.
<u>Principle of internal control </u>does not include application of technological controls
Explanation:
<u>The seven important internal control procedures include separation/segregation of duties/job responsibilities , providing access to various controls, performing physical audits, standardization of documents, trial balances, periodic reconciliations of the financial statements , and approval authority.</u>
Answer:
d. the tendency to choose a mate with similar personal characteristics.
Explanation:
Endogamy was common in ancient times to preserve the blood, the similarities between the members of the family, and the dynasties. However, this practice was dangerous because of the possibility of creating a generation of members with some kind of genetic disease or malformation.
Answer:
(C) Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Explanation:
In 1965, a case between three teenagers who wore black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam war and were subsequently suspended for failing to remove the armbands and Des Moines Independent Community School District appeared before the Supreme Court. In a landmark verdict, the Supreme Court explained that all form of speech, both symbolic speech such as the protest with armbands are protected under the the first amendment right of freedom of speech and expression. The court concluded that freedom of speech includes as form of symbolic speech.
