Adam was unable to finish high school because he needed to go to work to help his family financially. This forms a Non-formative type of influence
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a Non-formative type of influence?</h3>
Generally, The term "nonnormative effects" refers to those that do not affect each member of a set in the same manner. Nonnormative suggests it does not affect everyone in the same way in the culture, while normative suggests it does (or not at all).
In conclusion, Adam dropped out of school before he could graduate from high school because he had to start earning money to support his family. This is an example of a non-formative impact.
Read more about the Non-formative type of influence
brainly.com/question/6912636
#SPJ1
Answer:
(1) establish the fund on January 1,
- Dr Petty cash fund 200
- Cr Cash 200
(2) reimburse it on January 8
- Dr Postage expenses 39
- Dr Transportation expenses 12
- Dr Delivery expenses 14
- Dr Miscellaneous expenses 28
- Cr Cash 93
(3) both reimburse the fund and increase it to $350 on January 8, assuming no entry in part 2.
- Dr Petty cash fund 150
- Dr Postage expenses 39
- Dr Transportation expenses 12
- Dr Delivery expenses 14
- Dr Miscellaneous expenses 28
- Cr Cash 243
The only difference between part 2 and 3 is that the Petty cash fund is increased by $150, and cash decreases by $243 instead of $93.
Answer: Efficiency wage theory
Explanation:
The efficiency wage theory is refers to the labor economics that argues about the wages fir the labor or workers in the market.
The main aim of the efficient wage theory is that it helps in increase the efficiency and the labor productivity by reducing the cost of the turnover in industries.
This theory is mainly developed by the Alfred Marshall as they denote the wages per unit labor efficiency. Therefore, the efficiency wage theory is the correct answer.
Answer:
Equilibrium Y = 462.5 , Equilibrium C = 362.5 , Equilibrium S = 100
Explanation:
- At equilibrium : Aggregate Demand = Aggregate Supply
[ AD = C + I ] = [ AS = C + S = Y ]
45 + 0.6Y + 0.05 W + 100 = Y → 45 + 0.6Y + 0.05 (800) + 100 = Y
45 + 40 + 100 + 0.6Y = Y → Y ; 185 + 0.6Y = Y
Y - 0.6Y = 185
0.4Y = 185
Y = 185 / 0.4 = 462.5
- Consumption C = 45 + 0.6Y + 0.05W
Putting Y value : C = 45 + 0.6 (462.5) + 0.05 (800) → C = 45 + 277.5 + 40
C = 362.5
- Income Y is either consumed (C) or saved (S). So, Y = C + S
Hence , S = Y - C → 462.5 - 362.5 = 100
Alternatively : As C + I = C + S
Hence, I = S
Equilibrium Savings = Given Investment = 100
Answer: The risk of stock out = 2.94%
Explanation:
Reorder point is calculated as: Lead time*demand per unit time=45*9=405
While the amount on-hand reaches 422 pounds, the manager was reordering lubricant.
During the lead time, Standard Deviation of Demand =Daily S.D*(Lead time)^0.5=3*(9^0.5)=9
Risk of Stock Out=(422-405)/9 S.D=1.89 S.D
From Normal distribution curve 1.89 S.D=0.0294=2.94%
Therefore, the risk of stock out=2.94%
