1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BlackZzzverrR [31]
3 years ago
13

witness testifies in front of the jury that he saw the defendant enter the convenience store about one minute before he heard gu

n shots. What type of evidence is this?
Law
1 answer:
fredd [130]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Testimonial evidence

Explanation:

Testimonial evidence is evidence provided by people who were in the vicinity of the area where the case was located, and who, under oath, assure that they saw or heard something related to the case.

In the question, we have a typical example of testimonial evidence because a witness is assuring that he saw the defendant in the area that is related to the case, but is not necessarily providing any other type of evidence to support that claim. Whether the testimony is considered truthful or not, or relevant or not, depends on the context of the case, and on the ultimate decision of the jury.

You might be interested in
Roads in urban areas are generally _____.
attashe74 [19]

Answer: narrower Im pretty sure

3 0
2 years ago
The law making process is similar in the House and Senate with slight
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

Both houses must accept the bill

Explanation:

Before a bill can be passed on to the president to either veto or pass, it must first be approved by both the House and the Senate. The houses generally hash out their differences, rewrite the bill, and provide the final draft to the president who can then either veto the bill or pass it. There are also other ways in which a bill can be passed if the president vetoes it. For example, the chamber that originated the legislation can attempt to override the veto by a vote of two-thirds of those present.

6 0
3 years ago
Explain consequences of interfering with the right to vote on the rule of law.
Neporo4naja [7]
The answer is B. It creates a misinterpretation in understanding the con situation.
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suppose you have a collision involving another car with a single occupant, the driver. It is your fault. No one is seriously hur
Rasek [7]
Okay well the total costs would be:
1500+3000+6000+15000+30000
= $55 500
now it depends on how much the insurance. there is no average settlement on how much insurance is payed.
4 0
2 years ago
What are the differences between long run and short run in economics<br>​
Ghella [55]

Answer:

The long run is a period of time in which all factors of production and costs are variable. In the long run, firms are able to adjust all costs.

The short run firms are only able to influence prices through adjustments made to production levels.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Prison reforms in the United States have taken place _____. in the 17th century in the 19th century in the 18th century at all p
    12·1 answer
  • Are bodies of nonelected government officials and/or an administrative
    6·2 answers
  • Charged with DUI for driving with prescription medicat
    15·1 answer
  • What is the original jurisdiction in which courts have it?
    8·2 answers
  • Bob ross is a good person but not so amazing that you have to be absolutely OBSESSED with him right?
    10·1 answer
  • Tern for when businesses produce goods and services that consumer do not want​
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following are rules designed to maintain a common order
    15·2 answers
  • Describe the electoral process in primary and general elections?
    10·1 answer
  • 7
    13·1 answer
  • an employer can eliminate a worker’s medical, optical, or dental insurance coverage on the voluntary termination of the worker’s
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!