1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
BlackZzzverrR [31]
2 years ago
13

witness testifies in front of the jury that he saw the defendant enter the convenience store about one minute before he heard gu

n shots. What type of evidence is this?
Law
1 answer:
fredd [130]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Testimonial evidence

Explanation:

Testimonial evidence is evidence provided by people who were in the vicinity of the area where the case was located, and who, under oath, assure that they saw or heard something related to the case.

In the question, we have a typical example of testimonial evidence because a witness is assuring that he saw the defendant in the area that is related to the case, but is not necessarily providing any other type of evidence to support that claim. Whether the testimony is considered truthful or not, or relevant or not, depends on the context of the case, and on the ultimate decision of the jury.

You might be interested in
What are 3 useful questions to ask when drafting a law?
nevsk [136]
1. what are the clients business purpose and objectives?
2. what are the structure and operations of the deal?
3. who will likely use the document going forward?
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is the Supreme Courts interpretation of the 14th Amendment and use of selective incorporation a
hram777 [196]

Answer and Explanation:

The 14th amendment cannot be a violation of the concept of federalism, as federalism is in accordance with the concepts covered in the Bill of Rights and only allows for the separation and sharing of powers between state and federal governments if this does not hurt the concepts covered by the Bill of Rights. These concepts are strengthened with the 14th amendment and for this reason, we should not consider that this amendment could harm the concept of federalism.

The ability of a state to create its own laws must be maintained even if people can move from one state to another, because this allows states to organize and maintain order in their territories, independent of their inhabitants. In this case, the individual who is moving from state to state must adapt to the laws of the territory, so that he/she can remain in the place.

7 0
2 years ago
URGENT PLS HELP
DanielleElmas [232]
C
More than likely

Hope it helps
4 0
2 years ago
The PAYGO Budget Rule applies to which of the following government expenses?
Nata [24]
Answer:b is the answer I think.....
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Any case can be heard in a federal court.<br> True<br> False
Tems11 [23]

False.

Federal court jurisdiction is limited to certain types of cases listed in the US constitution

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Do you agree or disagree that the state should build roads with the help of federal funds? Is it fair for all states to give mon
    5·1 answer
  • What is the burden of proof in a criminal case?
    12·1 answer
  • Continue to drink or use other drugs and drive but be more careful
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following does NOT happen at an arraignment?
    13·1 answer
  • Falling to respect the right to work of disabled people results *
    6·1 answer
  • Explain in detail what the "rational choice" theory is and how it relates to juvenile delinquency.
    8·1 answer
  • 1. Look at the Image called Judicial Referees.This political cartoon best depicts what important government concept
    11·1 answer
  • Mea 9884 gpiusysvme its a word scramble
    8·1 answer
  • Explain a positive and negative of using the Presidential form of government And Explain a positive and a negative aspect to usi
    10·1 answer
  • Who Is The Lady Massiah
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!