Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

10

Ecosia is one solution to climate change. Why?

1 answer:

balu736 [363]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

NATURAL DISASTERS ARE UP… dramatically

CO2 concentrations in our atmosphere are up … dramatically

TEMPERATURES are up … dramatically

"There is no need to add additional taxes to combat climate change. The best bet is simply QUIT SUBSIDIZING those human activities which causing AGW.

World-wide, Fossil Fuels & industries suck up subsidy Dollars. SUCK UP roughly 6.5% of GDP ... TRILLIONS of DOLLARS in subsidies / supports (non taxable supports & subsidies!) ... In most cases the newer more modern energy and agricultural systems are more profitable and less damaging to the environment already.

So there is no need to tax people to subsidize those things harming the environment, then taxing us again to penalize those same ones we just subsidized!

A house divided against itself cannot stand. -Lincoln (paraphrasing the Bible)

It is time for a strong political leader to take charge and end this deadlock. ... We could either reduce taxes and let the new technologies out compete the obsolete systems we depend on now, or we could keep taxes the same and simply redirect the subsidies we use for fossil fuels and destructive industrialized agriculture towards modern sustainable systems instead. The one thing that won’t work is keep the tax and spend schemes the Neo-Luddites have made for themselves now, and also add even more tax and spend schemes for their competing new technologies too!

Yes that’s right, the top two causes for global warming are heavily subsidized.[1][2][3][4] It is literally insanity. ...

hope this helps have a great morning❤️

You might be interested in

A recent study focused on the number of times men and women send a Twitter message in a day. The information is summarized below

jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer:

The value of the test statistic = 2.58

Test statistic Z = - 4.805

|Z| = 4.805 > 2.58

Null hypothesis is rejected The value of the test statistic = 2.58

There is significant difference between in the mean number of times men and women send a Twitter message in a day

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(i):-

Sample size of men n₁ = 25

mean of the first sample x₁⁻ = 20

Standard deviation of the first sample σ₁ = 5

Sample size of women n₂ = 30

mean of the second sample x₂⁻ = 30

Standard deviation of the first sample σ₂ = 10

Level of significance ∝= 0.01

<u>Step(ii)</u>:-

Null Hypothesis : H₀: There is no significant difference between in the mean number of times men and women send a Twitter message in a day

Alternative Hypothesis :H₁:There is significant difference between in the mean number of times men and women send a Twitter message in a day

Test statistic

$Z = \frac{x^{-} _{1} - x^{-} _{2} }{\sqrt{\frac{S.D_{1} ^{2} }{n_{1} }+\frac{ S.D_{2} ^{2}}{n_{2} } } }$

$Z = \frac{20 - 30 }{\sqrt{\frac{(5)^{2} }{25 }+\frac{ (10)^{2} }{ 30} } }$

Z = $\frac{-10}{2.081} = - 4.805$

The value of the test statistic = 2.58 C

|Z| = 4.805 > 2.58

Null hypothesis is rejected The value of the test statistic = 2.58

<u>Conclusion:</u>-

There is significant difference between in the mean number of times men and women send a Twitter message in a day

7 0

3 years ago

Which of the following statements is not true about this graph?

agasfer [191]

B. It is not true. The point at x=0 is not part of a solution for the piece wise function.

3 0

3 years ago

navik [9.2K]

1.
20= 2(x-4)
20/2= 2(x-4)/2
10= x-4
+4 . +4
14=x

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Estimate 18.50 x 2.6

marysya [2.9K]

Answer:

57

Step-by-step explanation:

18.5= 19

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Find the value of the length x rounded to 1 DP.

borishaifa [10]

Answer:

24

Step-by-step explanation:

29+8+90=127

180-127=53

23.95

or 24

Give brainliest pls

3 0

3 years ago