Answer:
-4x-32 Can i please get a brainliest because this correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
−4(x+7)−4
Distribute:
=(−4)(x)+(−4)(7)+−4
=−4x+−28+−4
Combine Like Terms:
=−4x+−28+−4
=(−4x)+(−28+−4)
=−4x+−32
Answer:
=−4x−32
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
hello :
(0.04)^3/2=√(0.04)^3 =√(2²/10^2)^3 = √((2/10)^2)^3
(0.04)^3/2=√((2/10)^3)^2=8/1000 = 0.008
Answer:
2nd choice: The ball first bounced up to the height of 2 meters, and then falls 2 meters towards the ground
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide the numerical coefficients and write the quotation in simplest form
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.