1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gtnhenbr [62]
4 years ago
13

Does a diplomat always represent one party’s interests to another party?

History
2 answers:
Masja [62]4 years ago
8 0

Yes

A diplomat is someone United Nations agency is selected by a rustic state to talk to and make sure that country's interests abroad. The four positions of representatives square measure determined by universal law and incorporate representatives, agents, ministers, and diplomatist. In current discretion, there square measure numerous positions below representative.


These positions currently once in an exceedingly whereas demonstrate a mission's significance, nevertheless rather demonstrate the negotiator's rank within their own explicit country's discretionary vocation ladder. This last positioning framework takes a comparable, nevertheless not exactly parallel, the instance in numerous nations.



Rufina [12.5K]4 years ago
3 0
The answer to this question is yes
You might be interested in
Describe how these leaders (Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois) ideologies help fight discrimination.
Vanyuwa [196]
W.E.B. Dubois believed that African Americans should fight for racial equality.

Booker T. Washington believed that African Americans were supposed to accept the labor that they were receiving.
8 0
3 years ago
In petersonv. wilmur communications, inc., the employer demoted an employee after he appeared in a newspaper article describing
Ainat [17]
<span>The summary of the Peterson v. Wilmur Communications, Inc. lawsuit is already addressed in the question. The case had a summary judgement based upon two parts. Is the belief called "Creativity" a religion? And if Creativity is a religion, was Peterson demoted solely due to his belief in Creativity? This answer will only address the first question in the case. Creativity does claim to be a religion, but does not claim any belief in an afterlife, or any sort of supreme being. The court had a two pronged approach as to the issue of Creativity being a religion. Were the plaintiff's beliefs "sincerely held"? The court ruled that the plaintiff did claim to sincerely believe in Creativity, and that the defendant offered no contrary evidence. So the first prong of the test was upheld. The second prong was does the plaintiff consider his belief in Creativity to be religious and that Creativity is a religion? The court considered that prong to also be true considering that the plaintiff was a Minister in The World Church of the Creator, and swore an oath upon becoming one over three years prior to the law suit. So with the above summary in mind, let's look at the available choices. a religion under title vii of the civil rights act of 1964, as unorthodox, and even as repulsive, as it was. * This is a true statement and the correct choice. not a religion under title vii of the civil rights act of 1964 due to it being so unorthodox and repulsive in nature. * The court did declare that Creativity was a religion, so this is a bad choice. not a religion under title vii of the civil rights act of 1964 because it espoused racial separation, which violated title vii. * The court did declare that Creativity was a religion, so this is a bad choice. a religion under title vii of the civil rights act of 1964 because the claimant engaged in deity worship, a prerequisite to recognize any religious practice. * Yes, Creativity is a religion. But no, it does not believe in a God or a supreme being. So this is a bad choice.</span>
3 0
4 years ago
What does Brennan’s anecdote about the two wounded soldiers in the water suggest about the people involved?
belka [17]

Answer:

can someone please answer my question

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Why did Americans apposed slavery
musickatia [10]

Answer:

Americans opposed slavery because they started to think that it was inhumane.

Explanation:

Having one race that is superior to the other is very inhumane, and it was also incompatible with Christianity. Thus, they made amendments such as the 13th, which made slavery outlawed and the 14th, which makes everyone under American law equal.

6 0
4 years ago
True or false yellow bird was leading a group of Sioux to the Pine Ridge reservation​
Goshia [24]

Explanation: True

The Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (Lakota: Wazí Aháŋhaŋ Oyáŋke), also called Pine Ridge Agency, is an Oglala Lakota Native American reservation located in the U.S. state of South Dakota.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • While freedom of speech is protected by the Bill of Rights, why are certain speech acts are still illegal [such as yelling “fire
    14·2 answers
  • What effect did the Spanish settlement have on the Native Americans?
    14·1 answer
  • The ________________ system allowed a grant of 50 acres of land for each paid settler to Virginia.
    12·1 answer
  • How should freedom be protected or preserved
    14·1 answer
  • How did the outcome of the Whiskey Rebellion demonstrate that the Constitution had more power?
    11·1 answer
  • What was the impact of the peace of Paris on native people? ​
    14·1 answer
  • Many american, british, and australian troops were taken prisoner including about
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following distinguished the Atlantic slave trade in the Americas trom past instances of slavery in world history
    5·1 answer
  • Why did nativisrs oppise immigration?​
    15·1 answer
  • Which international organization's primary goal is to create a single economy to improve trade and travel within the European
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!