<u>Answer:
</u>
The psychological phenomenon that best explains the change is that of prospective forgetting.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- As a part of human fallibility, some people tend to unknowingly opt to live according to their older routines in a few days after trying to bring a change in their lives.
- This unknowing shift backward is in psychological terms referred to as prospective forgetting. In this type of forgetting, the person is unaware of the changes that are happening slowly and gradually.
Answer:
I will de-accelerate my Prius to allow the red car maneuver.
Explanation:
Recall that the vehicles on the right are moving at the same pace with the SUV, to minimize the tailgating hazard, I will reduce my speed and by so doing slow all vehicles coming from behind my lane. This will allow the red car maneuver to my lane and continue its journey, while follow behind.
Answer:
Mark has formed a dispositional attribution
Explanation:
A dispositional attribution consists in assigning the outcome of an event to internal personality factors.
In this example, Mark has observed that Juan is a good team leader in basketball practice. Instead of thinking that Juan is a good leader because the game requires him to act in such a way (this would be an example of a situational attribution), he considers that Juan is himself a good leader, because he has the personality characteristics of one, regarless of the situation in which he might be involved.
The answer for the
blank space is <span>"Elastic" or "necessary and proper clause".</span><span>
</span><span>To make all Laws which should be important and appropriate
for conveying into Execution the enumerated powers, and every single other
Power vested by this Constitution in the Legislature of the United States is
mentioned in the elastic or necessary and proper clause</span>
<u>Answer</u>:
A. Concurring opinion
<u>Explanation</u>:
In law, a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different (or additional) reasons as the basis for his or her decision.
Plz rate as Brainliest