1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bixtya [17]
3 years ago
12

Please help me with the question please ASAP ASAP please please ASAP please please help please please ASAP please please IM BEGG

ING FOR Help

Mathematics
2 answers:
Oksi-84 [34.3K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Ok if you look at the figure, it is a vertical angle. This means that the angle opposite to each other is congruent.

m<1 is congruent to m<3

m<2 is congruent to m<4

m<3 is 60⁰ and is congruent to m<1. This means that m<1 is 60⁰. m<4 is 30⁰ and is congruent to m<2. This means that m<2 is 30⁰.

m<1 = 60⁰

m<2 = 30⁰

m<3 = 60⁰

m<4 = 30⁰

Hope this helps, thank you :) !!

Brums [2.3K]3 years ago
3 0
I’m not sure but i think it would be non do the above
You might be interested in
What is 3/15 in simplest form
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]

Answer:

3/15 in the simplest form is 1/5....

when you divide by 3 it gives 1/5.

8 0
3 years ago
Which following fractions is equivalent to 0.45
vladimir1956 [14]

0,45=\frac{45}{100} =\frac{9}{20}

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
To ensure that the horizontal segments are parallel, x must equal
andrezito [222]

Answer:

53

Step-by-step explanation:

Because its 53.

6 0
3 years ago
Horse Of Course sells "Juan the horse" t-shirts for $23. Due to increased popularity, the store will raise the price by 8%. What
Sliva [168]

Answer:

the new price of the t-shirt is $24.84

Step-by-step explanation:

The computation of the new price of the t-shirt is shown below

= Price of the t-shirt × (1 + increased percentage)

= $23 × (1 + 0.08)

= $23 × 1.08

= $24.84

Hence, the new price of the t-shirt is $24.84

We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come

And, the same is to be considered

7 0
3 years ago
Values for the labor force participation rate of women​ (LFPR) are published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. A researche
Anna [14]

Answer:

(A) For this research we made use of the paired t test.

(B) For the t test, we conclude that in the null Hypothesis H₀, there was no difference between the average labor force participation rate for women between the years of 1968 and​ 1972 as against the alternate Hypothesis Hₐ.

From the output data we have, since the P value is 0.024 and  is lesser than the alpha value of 0.05, we will accept the alternate Hypothesis instead of the null Hypothesis.

Note:Kindly find an attached copy of the complete question below.

Step-by-step explanation:

Solution

Recall that:

The U.S of Bureau of Labor Statistics have published Values for the labor force participation rate of women​ (LFPR).

We are more interested in if there was a difference between female participation 1968 and​ 1972, a rapid change in women.

so we will check values for 19 randomly selected cities for 1968 and​ 1972,

Now,

(a) Which of this test is most appropriate for this data

The test which will be more suitable for these data will be paired to test t.

Because the data is for labor force participation for two different years, we apply the t test. now that we are making a comparison of two different year times, we will apply the t test in this research.

In this case, the sample size for both the years evaluated should be same, since we need to pair each and all the data.

(b)By using the test you selected, explain your conclusion

Now, to test the data paired t test, we have already the null Hypothesis  H₀: In this case there  is no difference between the average labor force participation rate for women between the years of 1968 and​ 1972 as compared with the alternate Hypothesis Hₐ: there was a significant difference between the average labor force participation rate for women between the years of 1968 and​ 1972.

However, from the output, we have that the P value is 0.024 which is lower than the alpha value of 0.05.

In conclusion, the alternate Hypothesis accepted while the null Hypothesis is rejected.

Note: kindly find an attached copy of the complete question to this solution

below.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Complete the statement with the best answer.
    6·2 answers
  • Whats 91 divided by 2605
    7·2 answers
  • The quadrilateral with the following vertices is a parallelogram.
    12·2 answers
  • A(-3, 0) B(2, 4) C(6, -1) D(1, -5) What is the perimeter and area of quadrilateral ABCD?
    7·1 answer
  • Help with this one!!!<br><br><br> Show steps pls :)
    6·2 answers
  • Help!...................
    11·1 answer
  • Please help I will give points and mark brainliest
    5·1 answer
  • What is the exact angle between the clock hands at 6:45:00 PM? Plz show work
    5·2 answers
  • pls help me asap and fast and for every question, you have to explain to me how you got the answer the one who did all of the wi
    11·1 answer
  • Please help question attached below!
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!