I'm not completely sure, but this should be exponential growth.
If so, the equation for exponential growth is: y = a(1 + r)^t
If I substitute them with the information you gave me, then is would look like this:
y = 281.4(1 + 0.02)^t
**t = is the number of years after 2000 (based on your question)**
Finished!
Answer:
1135.38
Step-by-step explanation:
100%->1015
100-6=94
94%->954.1
--------------------------------------------------
100%->954.1
119%->1135.379
≈1135.38
You are trying to find how much younger Kaylee is than Lylah.
You would subtract her age from Lylah's.
45-18= 27
Kaylee was 27 years younger than Lylah.
I hope this helps!
~kaikers
The 3 would be the y, so it would be 4x-3y
The first option is
The second option is
So, neither of them is equivalent to 
