Answer:
Consider, for example, the categorical syllogism: No geese are felines. ... Clearly, “Some birds are not felines” is the conclusion of this syllogism. The major term of the syllogism is “felines” (the predicate term of its conclusion), so “No geese are felines” (the premise in which “felines” appears) is its major premise.
Explanation:
Both a wave and a particle description of light are possible. The dual character of light has been highlighted in particular by two investigations.
<h3>What is made up of Light?</h3>
Photons are electromagnetic field bundles that contain a set amount of energy and are the building blocks of light. Photons can be counted or even individually measured with sensitive enough studies.
Both a particle and a wave can be used to describe light. The dual nature of light has been demonstrated through two tests in particular. The particles we refer to as "photons" when imagining light as being composed of them are small. A certain quantity of energy is carried by each photon, which has no mass.
Learn more about Light here:
brainly.com/question/15200315
#SPJ1
Based on the fact that Anna tries to use logic as well as cause and effect, the trait she is likely strong in is B. Thinking.
<h3>What trait is Anna strong in?</h3>
Anna is most likely strong with the "thinking trait" because she shares characteristics with others who think a lot.
They try to use logical reasoning, and they use cause-and-effect associations to make decisions.
Find out more personality traits at brainly.com/question/7375078
#SPJ1
Answer:
How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?
What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?
Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!) pls keep it organized
Explanation:
Answer:
It should be B. Get individual states to get along.
Explanation:
The article basically outlines the relationship between the states as well as the relationship between the government and individual states.
