Answer:
a) Jenna's tax basis = $45,000 + ($13,000 - $10,000) = $48,000
loss allocation = $65,000
loss limited by her tax basis = $65,000 - $48,000 = $17,000
b) Jenna's at risk loss = $48,000 - $13,000 = $35,000
c) Jenna's loss limited by passive activity = $35,000 - $4,000 = $31,000
Answer: Option (d) is correct.
Explanation:
Amount paid for candy = $1,500
Items received = 8,500 pieces of candy
Group 1 = 2,500 pieces
Selling price = $0.15 each
sale value = pieces sold × Selling price
= 2,500 × $0.15 each
= $375
Group 2 = 5,500 pieces
Selling price = $0.36 each
sale value = pieces sold × Selling price
= 5,500 × $0.36 each
= $1,980
Group 3 = 500 pieces
Selling price = $0.72 each
sale value = pieces sold × Selling price
= 500 × $0.72 each
= $360
Total sale value = $375 + $1,980 + $360
= $2,715
= 72.92%
Proportion of cost for Group 2 = cost × Percentage of sale in Group 2
= $1,500 × 72.92%
= $1,093.8
= $0.1988
= $0.20(approx)
Answer:
$4760
Explanation:
700 units at 6.80 value/unit
700 x 6.80
= 4760
Answer:
Mitigate his damages
Explanation:
By law, mitigation involves making effort to reduce losses. Now, an individual claiming damages or losses due to break in contract or a wrongful act by another individual has a duty under the law to mitigate those damages. That is to say, the plantiff is under a duty under the law to reduce the loss by taking advantage of any opportunity arising that may help.redice the losses or damages. However, in this case, the plantiff, who's the landlord Henry did not mitigate the loss by not attempting to or renting the accommodation out for the remaining six month. Thus, the damages would likely be reduced because he failed to mitigate his damages as he should have done as required under the law.
Debt ceiling crisis!
we call it debt ceiling crisis
