I believe it's cross examination (the interrogation of a witness called by one's opponent). But I'm not 100% positive.
Answer:B. Opponents of active stabilization policy believe that significant time lag in both fiscal and monetary policy often excercebate economic fluctuations.
C. Advocate of active stabilization policy believe that the government can adjust monetary and fiscal policy to counter waves of excessive optimism and pessimism among consumers and business.
Examples of automatic stabilizer
A. Corporate income taxes
B. Personal income taxes
Explanation:
Stabilization policy helps to stabilize the economy during expansionary or deficit period however a lag in the implementation will surely affect getting the right outputs from the implementation.
The economy has inbuilt stabilizer s that tend to correct excessiveness in economy such as the personal and corporate tax . The federal fund rate will be adjusted as the need be to stabilizer the economy even though it can be used as a stabilizer but it's not an automatic stabilizer.
Answer: democratic leadership
Carmen stated a possible solution that was increasing tuition fee and then Carmen said that it should be considered. This means that she did not impose it that that is the only solution and that has to be done in any way, if she did then it would’ve been autocratic leadership.
Carmen left some room for discussion and this means it is a democratic approach in leadership.
Answer:
Cost of goods sold = $8,800
Explanation:
<em>The cost of goods is represents amount incurred to make available what has been sold. It is computed as follows:</em>
<em>Cost of goods sold = opening stock + purchases - closing inventory</em>
It is useful to determine the cost of goods so as to calculate the gross profit margin. The gross profit is the sales revenue less cost of goods sold.
So we can compute same for the sporting equipment store as follows:
Cost of goods sold = 3,800 + 7,800 - 2,800
= $8,800
Cost of goods sold = $8,800
Answer:
Answer Illustration : Opportunity Cost of producing Wine is lesser in France, Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters is lesser in Tunisia. So, France has comparative advantage in Wine, Tunisia in Sweater.
Explanation:
Opportunity Cost is the cost of next best alternative foregone while choosing an alternative.
Opportunity Cost of producing Sweaters & Wine in France & Tunisia are quantities of other goods (Sweaters or Tunias) sacrifised while choosing either. Sweater Opportunity Cost - Wines sacrifised, Wine Opportunity Cost - Sweaters sacrifised.
The country has a comparative advantage in a good if it can produce it with relatively less opportunity cost (in terms of other good sacrifised) than other country.
Ex : Production Possibilities
Wine Sweater Trade off (Wine :Sweater)
France 10 5 1:0.5 or 2:1
Tunisia 8 24 1:3 or 0.33:1
- France produces Wine with lesser opportunity cost (sweater sacrifised) than Tunisia [0.5 sweater < 3 sweaters] ; it has comparative advantage in Wine.
- Tunisia produces Sweater with less opportunity cost (wine sacrifised) than France [ 0.33 wine < 2 wines] ; it has comparative advantage in Tunisia
