6 3/4 + 3 1/8 whats the answer?

The perimeter of a rectangle changes from 2.5 to 10 after a dilation. What was the scale factor of the dilation?

yawa3891 [41]

Scale factor = new length/old length

scale factor = 10/2.5 = 4

The scale factor is 4.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

X-(-6)=-2 EXPLAIN YOUR ANSWER

Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer:

If your asking for the Value of X the answer would be (-8)

Step-by-step explanation:

when your subtracting a negative, it's the same as addition, and if the equation should be equal to 2, then the answer would be (-8), because

(-8) - (-6) = -2.

8 0

3 years ago

Name a segment that is a diameter. How long is it

sattari [20]

Answer:

Cieee ketemu monyet kesesat

Step-by-step explanation:

Tolongin gw nyeth TvT

5 0

3 years ago

In a simple random sample of 300 boards from this shipment, 12 fall outside these specifications. Calculate the lower confidence

Lyrx [107]

Answer:

The 95% confidence interval for the percentage of all boards in this shipment that fall outside the specification is (1.8%, 6.2%).

Step-by-step explanation:

In a random sample of 300 boards the number of boards that fall outside the specification is 12.

Compute the sample proportion of boards that fall outside the specification in this sample as follows:

$\hat p =\frac{12}{300}=0.04$

The (1 - α)% confidence interval for population proportion p is:

$CI=\hat p\pm z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n}}$

The critical value of z for 95% confidence level is,

$z_{\alpha/2}=z_{0.05/2}=z_{0.025}=1.96$

*Use a z-table.

Compute the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of all boards in this shipment that fall outside the specification as follows:

$CI=\hat p\pm z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n}}\\=0.04\pm1.96\sqrt{\frac{0.04(1-0.04)}{300}}\\=0.04\pm0.022\\=(0.018, 0.062)\\\approx(1.8\%, 6.2\%)$

Thus, the 95% confidence interval for the proportion of all boards in this shipment that fall outside the specification is (1.8%, 6.2%).

6 0

3 years ago

What is wrong with the following proof? Clearly we know that 1 does not equal 2. What rule of algebra did we break that makes th

Gnoma [55]

An attempt to divide by zero gives a contradictory result

A rule of algebra broken is dividing by zero (leading to a contradiction) and stating a finite result

Reason:

The given calculation is presented as follows;

1. a > 0, b > 0 given

2. a = b given

3. a·b = b²

4. a·b - a² = b² - a²

5. a·(b - a) = (b + a)·(b - a)

6. a = b + a

7. 0 = b

8. b = 2·b

9. 1 = 2

From line 4, the result are;

4. a·b - a² = b² - a² = 0

5. a·(b - a) = (b + a)·(b - a) = 0

On line 6, both sides where divided by (b - a) = 0, which should given an infinite result

Therefore, one rule of algebra broken is dividing by zero to get a finite result

In line 7, we have;

7. 0 = b

From 6. a = b + a, and a = b, we have;

8. b = 2·b

Therefore, line 9 should be;

9. 0 = 2·0; 0 = 0, given that we have;

1 × 0 = 0

2 × 0 = 0

∴ 1 × 0 = 2 × 0

However

1 ≠ 2

In line 9., by dividing by b = 0, again, we have;

9. 1 = 2 (a contradiction)

Therefore, one rule of algebra that is broken is dividing by zero and having a finite result

Learn more about the rules of algebra here:

brainly.com/question/11388301

5 0

3 years ago