Answer:
On Monday December 2nd human remains were discovered in Griffith Park Monday, prompting a homicide investigation, according to police. So far there is no suspects involved. The outcome will mist likely be that they will most likely find a suspect that commited the crime.
Explanation:
The Article I found this from is
<u>Decapitated body found in Griffith Park prompts investigation</u>
Answer:
How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?
What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?
Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!) pls keep it organized
Explanation:
Answer:
c. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence.
Explanation:
Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence. Sally is obligated for his carelessness. Since Sally employed Glen and the obligation of any carelessness turns into Sally's inevitably.
Answer:
option 2
Explanation:
contribute to the common good
hope this helps. good luck
Answer:
There are 4 basic market models: pure competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and pure monopoly. ... The best examples of a purely competitive market are agricultural products, such as corn, wheat, and soybeans.
Explanation:
